Off Topic Climate Change
- Thread starter Looney Leftie
- Start date
- Status
Anything that conflicts with the comfort blanket their self delusions have created, terrifies them.
^^ this is beta male stuff right there. A pitiful attempt to annoy
You are clearly irritated. Thing is, it is your own cognitive failure that is making you annoyed, not me.
Thing is, all those claiming meltdown are the ones who let what I said get to them. [HASHTAG]#projection[/HASHTAG]
you need to ditch the psychology, searching desperately for a win is just that, desperate.
I understand the topic somewhat, as I've spent a lot of time debunking psychobabble produced by that largely junk science area of science. Before you go off on a ******ed claim its not true~
Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test
https://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
FYI Springer Nature, is the premier science journal.
You read internet forums, I read research papers. Does that make you insecure? It seems so, as it does others on this thread which is why you have to keep attacking me personally.
You claim meltdown and talk about something you think you know of in the past, and talk of desperation? Take some self awareness classes
Another beta male appears. This one is afraid to see my posts because they will make him angry because he has no responses of worth to offer
I suppose it is just as well, otherwise he'll also start claiming I am having a meltdown. For the best I guess
1st off, yer man likes that post when he has no idea what he is looking at, hilarious
Perfect demonstration that you don't understand AGW at all
I stop in and here you are embarrassing yourself in a vein attempt to understand the topic, when you wont even read papers YOU cite W/m2 downward flux from CO2 is not even the question, it is how the earth's climate systems responds.
[HASHTAG]#feedbacks[/HASHTAG]
The question is also how the oceans interact, as the planet is essentially a ball with two fluids, oceans and atmosphere.
Ambles in with a graph he doesn't understand, and doesn't understand how it fits into AGW
It's not "measured" either, it's estimated. Easily proven by providing the spectrum of absorption and showing here that water vapor H2O overlaps much of the CO2 wavelength
As we can see, water vapor dominates and overlaps a significant proportion of the CO2 wavelength, and where there is overlap, the forcing can NOT be a measured distinction between the two.
You must log in or register to see images
Either way, it is irrelevant as no one really disputes this, what is disputed is how the planet's atmosphere and oceans react to the forcing.
and you have not one jot of evidence to offer (as it does not exist) that the forcing from human emissions is driving temperatures
the earth is 70% ocean. Re your graph as you can see, the downward flux from H20, yet you can't tell me how much water vapor comes from the oceans. No one can, they can only make wild guesses.
I love it that you pretend to know wtf you are talking about, it's cute, stick to posting sophistry in the form of tweets
Last edited:
Excess winter deaths in England and Wales highest since 1976
https://www.theguardian.com/society...eaths-in-england-and-wales-highest-since-1976
Fri 30 Nov 2018 12.39 GMT
The 1970s was a cooling spell. I do note a concerted effort to pretend there was no cooling scare in the 70s, but it's easily proven, I can publish a **** load of published papers, documentaries, news reports, scientific press releases.
The met office told us kids wont know what snow is in the year 2000
"There were 50,100 excess deaths in England and Wales last winter, when there was a prolonged spell of extreme cold, making it the highest number since 1976, figures have shown."
I will add a caveat, I dont think all those deaths were down to cold alone, the price of energy driven up by the renewable scam, has old people afraid to turn on the heating
and NO AGW does not predict increasingly cold winters in the UK, it never did. They only started that ****e with "climate change", after their 2000s predictions failed.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...eaths-in-england-and-wales-highest-since-1976
Fri 30 Nov 2018 12.39 GMT
The 1970s was a cooling spell. I do note a concerted effort to pretend there was no cooling scare in the 70s, but it's easily proven, I can publish a **** load of published papers, documentaries, news reports, scientific press releases.
The met office told us kids wont know what snow is in the year 2000
"There were 50,100 excess deaths in England and Wales last winter, when there was a prolonged spell of extreme cold, making it the highest number since 1976, figures have shown."
I will add a caveat, I dont think all those deaths were down to cold alone, the price of energy driven up by the renewable scam, has old people afraid to turn on the heating
and NO AGW does not predict increasingly cold winters in the UK, it never did. They only started that ****e with "climate change", after their 2000s predictions failed.
Last edited:
You must log in or register to see images
CET Central England Temperature
The changes in CO2 over the time span of CET, demonstrate my point that more or less CO2 does not simply translate into warming or cooling, and certainly not into worse or better weather. Only morons believe such a thing.
But try explaining that to @Looney Leftie
I see Michael E Mann was lying again on TV claiming drought and floods are worse, re the latest US climate report
Had Mann read the report, he'd know it claimed no such thing.
What we do know, is the central premise of AGW is that the troposphere over the tropics (where most of the solar energy comes in) must heat up and show a signal. No such signal has ever been detected
"climate change" was the idea of an IPCC Swedish bureaucrat, to deal with the PR problem of the planet not warming like they claimed it would
You must log in or register to see images
From the US climate report
So it seems, the US is not suffering from increasing heat extremes, it has been on a cooling trend in maximum temperatures for 80 years
Warming winters, is a sign of improving climate, not doom. I am sure CO2 has some effect, but no one can quantify it, and yet they claim it causes everything from dogs getting depressed to melting the ocean floor!
AGW should by the theory, raise minimum temperatures AND maximum temperatures, and it isn't
Last edited:
This ^^ is meant to "mean" something. Brings tweets to a scientific discussion. Embarrassing
another day, another Viking-like pillage and burning of idiocy on this thread
Punching out
You still haven't got it.This ^^ is meant to "mean" something. Brings tweets to a scientific discussion. Embarrassing
another day, another Viking-like pillage and burning of idiocy on this thread
There is no scientific discussion, it's a piss take on a football forum.
Your attempt to disprove my chart without awareness of its source, how the tests were performed and what it represents has given me a good chuckle.
You must log in or register to see images
Claims like these, the above one is a laugh, from 1989
Entire nations could be wiped off the earth if we don't act... 8 years ago
in 2006, we had 10 years left.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/...xpert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XAMb0uKxUWc
"A leading U.S. climate researcher says the world has a 10-year window of opportunity to take decisive action on global warming and avert catastrophe."
They have been promoting this horseshit for almost 40 years and everything doom claim they made was wrong.
This is not to say we dont have an effect, or that we should just keep emitting CO2 willy nilly.
There is just no evidence Co2 controls the planet's temperature and weather.
I wont even address the completely false bollocks about the oceans turning acidic from human emissions of CO2, because its pseudo science
Everyone you ever head say "tipping point" is either an idiot or a liar, earth is not Venus, it can never end up like Venus
Dont worry about CO2, this is something everyone should worry about
I guess the chemtrail conspiracy theorists deserve credit for coming up with that idea first. Or they've (scientists and governments) been experimenting with solar radiation management for 20 years.
Whichever Dimming the sun is the most dangerous ******ed thing I have ever heard scientists suggest.
If it went wrong, and cooling was dramatic, a few billion would die. I don't think there is even a year's worth of global grain reserve
You must log in or register to see images
I guess the chemtrail conspiracy theorists deserve credit for coming up with that idea first.
Or they've (scientists and governments) been experimenting with solar radiation management for 20 years.Whichever
Dimming the sun is the most dangerous ******ed thing I have ever heard scientists suggest.If it went wrong, and cooling was dramatic, a few billion would die. I don't think there is even a year's worth of global grain reserve
- Status