Off Topic Climate Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I was a kid I used to have sleepless nights about the ice age we were entering <yikes>

Pretty sure they used the same polar bear footage they show now for warming <laugh>


<laugh>


What alarmists wont tell you is, thick spring ice is more dangerous for polar bears than less summer ice, because they are liars and fools

and their numbers have increased as sea ice has declined over 30 years

If polar bears cannot penetrate the spring ice, they starve and spring is when they are just out of hibernation, and are thin and need to get food pronto

Seals will come to shore if/when there is no summer sea ice
You must log in or register to see images


Even so, there is no trend in arctic sea ice for a decade, while emissions have gone up and up

and the Polar bear doom, only exists in junk models that don't account for impacts of thick spring ice at all

The polar bear myth has been debunked, and its no longer the poster animal for AGW
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
<laugh>


What alarmists wont tell you is, thick spring ice is more dangerous for polar bears than less summer ice, because they are liars and fools

and their numbers have increased as sea ice has declined over 30 years

If polar bears cannot penetrate the spring ice, they starve and spring is when they are just out of hibernation, and are thin and need to get food pronto

Seals will come to shore if/when there is no summer sea ice
You must log in or register to see images


Even so, there is no trend in arctic sea ice for a decade, while emissions have gone up and up

and the Polar bear doom, only exists in junk models that don't account for impacts of thick spring ice at all

The polar bear myth has been debunked, and its no longer the poster animal for AGW
TBH showing a bear resting and sunning itself on an ice float between hunting dives was never a genius tactic from the advertising team :grin:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Angry_Physics
TBH showing a bear resting and sunning itself on an ice float between hunting dives was never a genius tactic from the advertising team :grin:


:D True

I also don't think alarmists know that Polar Bears spend most of their lives in water <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Time for a pretty graph.
You must log in or register to see images


You don't even make points. You are trying to infer there is less sea ice, without showing sea ice data <laugh> n even then, there is no trend in the last decade in your graph too <ok> That's for supporting my point
 
I like this one, arctic sea ice variation over the Holocene, more sea ice now than in the past 10,000 years (bar the little ice age) <ok>
You must log in or register to see images


AGW alarmists are not well in the head and know nothing of geological history
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
You must log in or register to see images


Well this temperature over greenland looks like it has an inverse relationship with the Holocene sea ice
You must log in or register to see images


fancy that

Temp goes up, ice goes down, lefty loony is a clown :bandit:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
http://www.pascalbonenfant.com/18c/geography/weather.html
British Weather from 1700 to 1849

"
July 1707
You must log in or register to see images
"Hot Tuesday": many heat-wave deaths in England (temperature details not known .. but must have been 'notable'!!)

1718, 1719
You must log in or register to see images
Fine summer weather gave a good crop of grapes at Richmond in both years, and the summer of 1719 was claimed to be one of the hottest for some time. Generally warm across the whole of England & Wales (using the CET series), with 1719 notably warm.

1729-1731 (Autumns)
You must log in or register to see images
Three years in a row with remarkably warm Autumn seasons. All three periods (September to November in each year) experienced CET anomalies of around +2degC on the long-term average. In 1729, the September of that year was the warmest such-named month (until 2006) in the CET record (16.6/+3.3C), followed by a near-average October, but a warm November (+2C). With 1730 & 1731, the warmth was consistent across all three months, with November of 1730 having an anomaly of over +3C. These latter two years (1730/1731) experienced the warmest autumns in the CET record until 2006 comprehensively beat them. (q.v.)
"

Lots more like that in there
 
1746
You must log in or register to see images
Hottest day on 18th July - temperature in shade 85 degF (29 degC)

Summer 1748
You must log in or register to see images
Hot days in June & July; temperature at 1 pm on 23rd July was 85 degF (29degC).
12th June 1748: Large hailstones, about 2 inches (50mm) in diameter, did considerable damage to windows and gardens during a thunderstorm.
1749
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
A dry summer. Shade temperature at about mid-day on 2nd July was 88 degF (31degC)
1790 (June)
You must log in or register to see images
Temperature of 91degF (33 degC) on 22nd June

How could this happen with CO2 so low then?!

We need to retroactively put carbon taxes on the 1700s SUV drivers in Britain


Just as well Thomas Cook wasn't in business in the 1700s @Diego
 
Last edited:
1746
You must log in or register to see images
Hottest day on 18th July - temperature in shade 85 degF (29 degC)

Summer 1748
You must log in or register to see images
Hot days in June & July; temperature at 1 pm on 23rd July was 85 degF (29degC).
12th June 1748: Large hailstones, about 2 inches (50mm) in diameter, did considerable damage to windows and gardens during a thunderstorm.
1749
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
A dry summer. Shade temperature at about mid-day on 2nd July was 88 degF (31degC)
1790 (June)
You must log in or register to see images
Temperature of 91degF (33 degC) on 22nd June

How could this happen with CO2 so low then?!

We need to retroactively put carbon taxes on the 1700s SUV drivers in Britain


Just as well Thomas Cook wasn't in business in the 1700s @Diego

You never get bored?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Looney Leftie
You never get bored?


No getting bored with the biggest case of scientists lining up for lavish funding to produce junk science, in human history.

If you want evidence and you are willing to give money to scientists, they will produce that evidence even if it doesn't exist.

We were warned about this 60 years ago, technocracies. That is what the IPCC is, politicians and bureaucrats using junk science to get their way
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
No getting bored with the biggest case of scientists lining up for lavish funding to produce junk science, in human history.

If you want evidence and you are willing to give money to scientists, they will produce that evidence even if it doesn't exist.

We were warned about this 60 years ago, technocracies. That is what the IPCC is, politicians and bureaucrats using junk science to get their way

Ok
 
Status
Not open for further replies.