Off Topic Climate change/ pollution

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It's ok everyone the beavers are going to save us. Plans to reintroduce beavers into the wild because they were a native species back in the 16th century and everything thing was nice back then.

It may have been nice because there was only 3 million living in the UK then compared to the 70 million now. I hope the beavers have been told which bits of land they can flood and those they can't.

Can't beat a bit of beaver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash, rovertiger, Erik and 1 other person
balkan tiger said:
It's ok everyone the beavers are going to save us. Plans to reintroduce beavers into the wild because they were a native species back in the 16th century and everything thing was nice back then.

It may have been nice because there was only 3 million living in the UK then compared to the 70 million now. I hope the beavers have been told which bits of land they can flood and those they can't.

Can't beat a bit of beaver.
Click to expand...
Last line straight out of the “ carry on series”
 
  • Like
Reactions: rovertiger and balkan tiger
balkan tiger said:
It's ok everyone the beavers are going to save us. Plans to reintroduce beavers into the wild because they were a native species back in the 16th century and everything thing was nice back then.

It may have been nice because there was only 3 million living in the UK then compared to the 70 million now. I hope the beavers have been told which bits of land they can flood and those they can't.

Can't beat a bit of beaver.
Click to expand...

A three decades long discussion on whether reintroducing a no-longer native species into nature will have a long term positive or negative effect on the natural environment... Meanwhile an Egyptian terrorist is put up in the Hilton, after arriving on a rubber dinghy without papers, and allowed to roam free to commit sexual assault. Could you make it up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk, Newlandcasual2 and Erik
Heimdallr said:
A three decades long discussion on whether reintroducing a no-longer native species into nature will have a long term positive or negative effect on the natural environment... Meanwhile an Egyptian terrorist is put up in the Hilton, after arriving on a rubber dinghy without papers, and allowed to roam free to commit sexual assault. Could you make it up?
Click to expand...

I haven't, have you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: What? A full dog? and dennisboothstash
Heimdallr said:
A three decades long discussion on whether reintroducing a no-longer native species into nature will have a long term positive or negative effect on the natural environment... Meanwhile an Egyptian terrorist is put up in the Hilton, after arriving on a rubber dinghy without papers, and allowed to roam free to commit sexual assault. Could you make it up?
Click to expand...
I get your drift but whatever dodgy is happening everything else in life has to go on concurrently thankfully. :emoticon-0100-smile
 
  • Like
Reactions: carry_on_the_grudge, Christophalophados, Newland Tiger and 1 other person
a recent (23/07/2025) u.s. paper on the impact of greenhouse gases on the climate.

there has been an absolute dearth of papers from anyone that dares to question the alleged climate crisis and its associated models that make more extreme and wild predictions about future events. those that disagree or voice disagreement tend to find themselves unemployed very quickly, which suggests the whole thing is politically driven. ed miliband is doing his best (and succeeding) to make british energy costs more than any others on the planet.

https://www.energy.gov/sites/defaul...mpacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newlandcasual2, Howdentiger2 and DMD
I believe I read that over 70% of weather stations give false data due to their location, ie at airports. The data from the majority of those stations is classed as ‘junk’.
At what point are people going to wake up and realise they’ve been conned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newlandcasual2 and Howdentiger2
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back