Why would I? It all sounds great to an envious povo like me.
So youare selective in your targets for not caring about your kids? And focus on the lesser ones?
Why would I? It all sounds great to an envious povo like me.
Whooooooooosh!!!!!So youare selective in your targets for not caring about your kids? And focus on the lesser ones?
Okay, **** China's industrial growth and **** building yet another runway.
That's still:
950,000,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases and 875,000,000 tonnes of CO2 coming from aircraft. The fact that the percentages are small in no way plays down the impact it has on climate change. Private jets probably don't contribute much compared to those figures, but anything that reduces the overall figure is going to be positive.
there's literally nothing to talk about mangerial wiseCan't you take the off-topic **** to another thread ?
Well personally I'm hoping that Acun doesn't fly too many prospective managers over, when there are plenty that are locally produced.Can't you take the off-topic **** to another thread ?
More coming from other sources though. Why not get those reduced?
Yes, they should, but it would be substantially easier to take care of the small things first and then move on to the bigger stuff. In an ideal world China would get a grip, but they’re not going to without a massive policy change so it’s better to focus on things we can alter right now than things we can’t.
Just because we’re talking about one thing, does not automatically mean everything else is off the table.
we shouldn't do anything about it becasue china wont so why should we
the mindset
Personally I'm hoping that mad bastard Putin doesn't launch any ballistic missiles over...That would really **** the planetWell personally I'm hoping that Acun doesn't fly too many prospective managers over, when there are plenty that are locally produced.
we shouldn't do anything about it becasue china wont so why should we
the mindset
Yes, we, responsible for about 1% of emissions should shut down, shiver in the dark and never go anywhere whilst China carries on regardless.
The mindset.
Or we could target the 100 companies responsible for 71% of emissions? But that's a whole different mindset.Yes, we, responsible for about 1% of emissions should shut down, shiver in the dark and never go anywhere whilst China carries on regardless.
The mindset.
Yes, they should, but it would be substantially easier to take care of the small things first and then move on to the bigger stuff. In an ideal world China would get a grip, but they’re not going to without a massive policy change so it’s better to focus on things we can alter right now than things we can’t.
Just because we’re talking about one thing, does not automatically mean everything else is off the table.
Or we could target the 100 companies responsible for 71% of emissions? But that's a whole different mindset.
Sanctions? Although it's far too late for that. They're all in it together.How much of those emissions are in this country? How many of those companies are UKmcompanies? How will you target them?
How will our reducing things make any difference? If the UKmshutbdownntomorrow it would only be a few months before levels were back to where they were due to China alone. Then there is India, the USA and elsewhere…Bolivia is worse than we are.