Clattenberg

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Apparently Hull City have not lost a Mark Clattenburg officiated game since 2003 (including games against Chelsea).
 
The Bullshit Man said:
I really cannot believe he's got away with this, it's ludicrous. Even more proof if any were needed of how bullet proof and protected referees are, if this was a player he'd be fined and banned. It's about time referees actually earned the respect they demand.
Click to expand...

I agree with you that if it was a player there'd be a massive uproar - because it's cool to think all footballers are thick, racist ****s - but really there is no case against Clattenberg at all and it's ridiculous that it ever got this far.
 
The Bullshit Man said:
I really cannot believe he's got away with this, it's ludicrous. Even more proof if any were needed of how bullet proof and protected referees are, if this was a player he'd be fined and banned. It's about time referees actually earned the respect they demand.
Click to expand...

How do you know he got away with anything? They said that their microphones are on all the time. So all the refs would have had to hear it if he said anything. When the FA announced that the microphones were linked to multiple people clearly they knew nothing was said.
 
originallambrettaman said:
the FA didn't refuse to help the police, the police took one look at it and saw it for the crock of **** it was and decided not to investigate.
Click to expand...

They declined to share their evidence until their own investigation was complete, it was on SSN. As the police were not actually charging anyone the FA were well within their right to do so. They knew there was nothing for the police to charge anyone with so wasting time sharing evidence would just be an inconvenience.
 
Airlie Tiger said:
They declined to share their evidence until their own investigation was complete, it was on SSN. As the police were not actually charging anyone the FA were well within their right to do so. They knew there was nothing for the police to charge anyone with so wasting time sharing evidence would just be an inconvenience.
Click to expand...

How can they decline to share evidence when there's no evidence to share?
 
Airlie Tiger said:
They declined to share their evidence until their own investigation was complete, it was on SSN. As the police were not actually charging anyone the FA were well within their right to do so. They knew there was nothing for the police to charge anyone with so wasting time sharing evidence would just be an inconvenience.
Click to expand...

As far as I'm aware, the only complaint to the police was made by that dipshit Peter Herbert and as nobody directly involved filed a complaint, the police didn't investigate anything. The FA can't have declined to give any evidence, if none was ever requested.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back