Oh great, we truly have the worlds most obnoxious poster don't we?
That point has been laboured ad nauseam above.
If you are so utterly juvenile as to believe that "I don't agree with one of your points, therefore the whole of your argument is wrong" is either a logical or a strong argument, you really are not worth the time of day.
Try reading what I've written above.
If you think Tettey and Fox play in a similar way, name of position aside, you need your head examined. If you think Tettey is worse technically than Fox, fine, but that's like arguing that Bassong is worse technically than Whittaker. Yes, both defenders, but what they bring to the game is different. Al I can say is that I would put a lot of money on Tettey being more valuable than Fox.
If your best effort at analysing my arguments/opinions is to not engage at all and just call it bilge, **** off. Care to comment on whether you agree that the other players I mentioned are technical improvements? Or can I just assume you disagree and are thick as pigshit?