Ptc, agree with all that you said, i thought we looked poor down the right side. Donacien for me is just not good enough, takes an age at throw ins, passing is poor, poor going forward and just looks uncomfortable in the right back position, far better as cb!! Fraser is not a right or left midfielder, he was bought as the best number ten in the division.....so Fecking play him there.
The two CB's done well imo, yes even Wolfy was better, maybe that was due to having Burgess beside him. Penney....hmmm not keen on him myself and look forward to Coulson coming in. My biggest concern at the back though is Hladky, just doesn't instill confidence in me, he looks quite small, maybe just an illusion though.
The rest.....Evans looked like a cm Maestro against Morecambe but since then he has looked less impressive, Harper has quality, Edwards will be our main threat and a handful, Fraser needs to play as a 10, Bonne is strong and quick, i think that miss may have dented his confidence a bit. Finally the Pig, not so sure on him, not that great in the air, not much pace and seems a little lost. To me he does not look like an out and out number 9.
I look forward to having some of the unavailable players available...
Hladky
KVY
Edmundson
Burgess
Coulson
Burns
Harper
Evans
Edwards
Bonne/Pig
Chaplin
Or something similar, i just think with the available players...442 is best but what do I know?
Holy in for Hladky for me.
Penney for Coulson in the XI. Coulson will be handy for cover in the full back positions and wings but he's not our player.
Unless there's a problem with Norwood I'd be putting him in.
Goes without saying I'd put Woolfy in.
Would have thought Tom Carroll is the best man to sit in front of the defence. If Edwards and Burns are wide then you're dropping Harper or Evans or playing five across the midfield, which is what I suspect will happen.
Don't understand for the life of me why we've brought in two loan forwards.

