Evening mukka, you won, didn't expect...... Sorry, wrong mukkaevening mukka you lost didnt expect to see you for while
Off Topic Cellino
- Thread starter themaclad
- Start date
It's a term I rarely use. In this case, tongue was firmly in cheek as I typed
Evening bud,evening mukka you lost didnt expect to see you for while
I was here Tuesday evening, keeping everyone informed how Port Vale were giving some pub team a Walloping
At least it won't be Shaks, would hate to think of him doing that, tripping and hurting himself and it would all be my fault
he wont fall far
Evening bud,
must have been me missing then
Cool mate, just remember, you are in control of a potentially offensive weapon, use that power wiselyIt's a term I rarely use. In this case, tongue was firmly in cheek as I typed
Yip, will do. Keeps her happyCool mate, just remember, you are in control of a potentially offensive weapon, use that power wisely
I was talking about grumpy not his missusYip, will do. Keeps her happy
That's one big sarf London finger...
That was a thread LL posted asking people to sign the petition to overturn Cellino's FL ban
Oops. Completely missed that. Will have a read tomorrow when I've woke up a bit. Cheers!
Again, and I'm really not trying to defend Cellino because if this is what forces him to sell and move on then its for the greater good of Leeds united BUT I don't see how they came to that conclusion from that video clip. Cellino wasn't offering them a chance to become a third party owner of any player. He was purely trying to get investment into Leeds United by selling off 20%. He was outlining what they get for their 20% ownership (20% of profits essentially which includes 20% profit from player sales as well).
This seemed very clear to me but I'm seeing a lot of articles that are saying very different things so either I am completely missing something or people are jumping on the "I hate Cellino and will do anything to make him look bad" bandwagon.
I'm really at a loss with this one.
