I thought Caulker had a decent game, but obviously everyone will focus on their goal. He was pushing forward trying to win the game and made a bad pass. He was entitled to expect that he would be covered. What the **** was Isla doing?
Got a feeling that Caulker might be latest scapegoat for people to hit on.....there always has to be a scapegoat, right?
![]()
I thought Caulker had a decent game, but obviously everyone will focus on their goal. He was pushing forward trying to win the game and made a bad pass. He was entitled to expect that he would be covered. What the **** was Isla doing?
No no no!!
What was Caulker doing? Knock the ****ing ball into the corner, keep your shape and see out the game for a hard fought point against the team in 4th place. We are in no position to go all gung ho at that stage of a game against a top 4 side FFS!!
No no no!!
What was Caulker doing? Knock the ****ing ball into the corner, keep your shape and see out the game for a hard fought point against the team in 4th place. We are in no position to go all gung ho at that stage of a game against a top 4 side FFS!!
The league position of the opposition is immaterial - I thought they were very ordinary. We needed to win today and that was what Caulker was trying to do.
,
Think the defene is the biggest problem. Big lack of quality there. It means we need to play more in DCM which reduces our attacking options.The defence isn't as bad as you're making out Ozzie. Its not great but its not our main problem. The middle of the park has always been our problem. One quality player in there and you'd notice the entire team perform better, defence and attack. Our back line is always under too much pressure.
I've said it all season and I'll say it again -
Caulker is shyt. He is a flower. Dereliction of duty, trots around the field like a girl and can't be bothered to defend.
Get rid.
We should have got a couple of solid young, hungry, un-afraid defenders in during the window, but alas, we're QPR.
), which leads to us losing the match because he wasn't covering, and his partner CB for the game had been subbed earlier!!!!Yes, but the way we are at the back it seems we need to play more than 1 or 2 protecting them. Christ we needed to protect Green as well today -he got lost a few times with awful positions and could have let in 2 or 3. He looked like he'did been up all nightA proper DCM does both Ozzie. He doesn't reduce our attacking options but increases them because as well as protecting the back four, he passes the ball quickly out to the wings (& elsewhere) and sets up counter-attacks. Think along the lines of a Roy Keane. Faurlin might have filled that role for us if he was fit.
You must log in or register to see images