Good eve old sparkey.
It will be a 2 point gap Saturday evening, I wouldn't trust us to beat Bascote under 5's, we've been that dire since the turn of the year.
If you're wondering, Brascote is, I believe, the smallest named settlement in England, consisting of a farm and a pub.
What's this about murky mackay? Do elaborate...
Heard the other side and it was a well deserved sacking
I've known OGS since his Molde days and I think you've a great manager and person there.
The game would not surprise me to be a score draw but my heart wants a 3-0 Hull win
What's the other side then, lmc?
Don't want to go too far down the road with this one - rather talk about football to be honest, but being the question's been asked, the spin put on this by the media was heavily biased.
There are no suggestions of "till fingers" (officially anyway) by either Malky nor his head of recruitment Ian Moody, but the same level of gross mismanagement of Tan's funds would have been more than enough to dismiss anyone in similar positions in industry - a football manager is no different.
Before the facts started to drift out, the media latched on to poor old Malky playing the sympathy card and portrayed him as the victim and Tan as some sort of anti-Christ. The infamous email that Tan sent to Malky was leaked (now believd to have been by Malky) to enhance the issue in the press and further the impression being cultivated. The image being portrayed of Malky as the perennial victim was far from the truth - he ****ed up and paid the price no question.
There's a catalogue of errors we could go into, but the stellar achievement must be the signing of Cornelius for £8M and £45K a week for 5 years, which with obscene agent's fees made a total comittment of £20M. The one year wonder in a poor league was sold back to Copenhagen 6 months later for £3M and an agreement over his wage contract - it cost the club £8.5M net.
The fact is the Malky and his HoR Moody wasted over £12M up front of Tan's money up front with some disastrous decision making.
The "Murky" mutation of his name refers to his manipulation of the media and is nothing to do with any alleged personal gains by him or Moody. There has been no public suggestion of that that I am aware and no evidence to support the rumblings.
One significant factor may be the outright refusal of Tan to pay up the rest of Malky's contract as he would have to do if he dismissed him for no reason other than choice. You would think Malky would challenge that through the courts - after all, he had a contract. The silence is deafening.