Bruce

[Sir Cheshire Ben]

I'm nothing to do with the OSC. I'm not even a member.

I was simply responding to your claim that 'any' request is ignored, when it clearly isn't the case.

Any request made to the OSC has been ignored.

 

[DMD]

Again, I don't give a **** about their spat. I just saw a question misread and a mistaken reply as a result, and I gave you a chance to correct it. Nothing you say can convince me you didn't misunderstand his post - it's open-and-shut.

Marvellous.

 

[DMD]

Any request made to the OSC has been ignored.

Except the ones that haven't.

I can't answer why yours seem to fail to get a response. I agree, that's poor on their part.

I'm not even a member, but they've called me a few times and had lengthy telephone conversations with a few on the board over issues I've raised with them over recent years. I didn't generally agree with what they were saying, but could usually understand why they said it.

You seem to be asking about the submission. What answer or detail do you expect over and about over what's already been posted?

 

[Sir Cheshire Ben]

Except the ones that haven't.

I can't answer why yours seem to fail to get a response. I agree, that's poor on their part.

I'm not even a member, but they've called me a few times and had lengthy telephone conversations with a few on the board over issues I've raised with them over recent years. I didn't generally agree with what they were saying, but could usually understand why they said it.

You seem to be asking about the submission. What answer or detail do you expect over and about over what's already been posted?

You know it was about the submission, but hey, you like to pick irrelevant holes.

Any requests made directly to the OSC regarding their decision to keep the submission they made to the FA on their members behalf a secret have been ignored.

 

[DMD]

You know it was about the submission, but hey, you like to pick irrelevant holes.

Any requests made directly to the OSC regarding their decision to keep the submission they made to the FA on their members behalf a secret have been ignored.

There is a comment about a discussion with an OSC Director on here which implies they were not ignored.

They didn't seem to get a clear answer, and yes, they should at least offer some reason why it isn't published, and yes, they should respond to members queries on it rather than just seemingly responding to the select few.

 

[Sir Cheshire Ben]

There is a comment about a discussion with an OSC Director on here which implies they were not ignored.

They didn't seem to get a clear answer, and yes, they should at least offer some reason why it isn't published, and yes, they should respond to members queries on it rather than just seemingly responding to the select few.

If you mean by TOM, he's a two faced, attention seeking, lying **** who changes his mind to suit the level of importance he thinks he can attract.

People who direct questions to the OSC should not have to come on here for a response. They are a self elected, back stabbing, back slapping body of ****s who only serve one purpose & that is to serve themselves & their own interests ignoring completely those who ask even the simplest of questions.

 

[DMD]

If you mean by TOM, he's a two faced, attention seeking, lying **** who changes his mind to suit the level of importance he thinks he can attract.

People who direct questions to the OSC should not have to come on here for a response. They are a self elected, back stabbing, back slapping body of ****s who only serve one purpose & that is to serve themselves & their own interests ignoring completely those who ask even the simplest of questions.

It's hard to imagine why you don't seem to get a reply.

They should offer some reason for not publishing it, even if it's just to say 'what's the point, when it's all done and the submission was pretty much just the last one with a new date?'

 

[Amin Arrears]

But you posted something that was not true and "private" minutes, well think about it. No apology at any point, no "sorry I got it wrong". No retraction.

Now I don't know exactly what your little game is, because a game it certainly is. You can try to discredit me as much as you like, I personally do not give a flying **** about what you say as I just see it as petty, whilst at the same time a little amusing. Funny thing is that your name came up when I was at the Brighton match, when I said that rather than being supportive of the involvement with the tribute yesterday, I was surprised that one of the board of the HCST implied that it was only for Brighton fans. The other person said that he too was surprised as he thought well of you.

So where exactly do you stand on clubs supporters joining together in remembrance? Would the HCST not have your support if they in the future were to do what we did yesterday?



As a mod can you explain how your reply to my quote is the first on the list?

Let me make something perfectly clear OLM, have as many goes as you like, pull me up as many times as you wish. If it brings up your post tally that's fine by me. But make sure that you tell the truth. A "man" would have apologised.

As if you've just brought up the memorial service of people who tragically lost their lives to use as a stick to poke with.

What a monumental bellend you are.

 

[The Omega Man]

I'm not attacking you, you dipshit, I just think the OSC should be more open, don't get so ****ing defensive.

I have no idea if the version of events I was given was true or not, I really don't give a **** either way.

As for bringing up yesterday's remembrance service, all I can say is **** off you utterly shabby ****.

This is so typical of you OLM. Its never you in the wrong.

"You'd hope (and expect) that City fans would respect the minute's applause, but the rest of the stuff is for the Brighton fans, it's really nothing to do with us."

"I was surprised that one of the board of the HCST implied that it was only for Brighton fans. The other person said that he too was surprised as he thought well of you."

If anyone is being a shabby **** its you.

We offered our condolences to the BHA Supporters Club and asked if we should provide a wreath. How that evolved over the next few days, was entirely led by "Brighton Fans" the football club and the families of all of the victims. The message for the whole day was "together".

 

[Sir Cheshire Ben]

It's hard to imagine why you don't seem to get a reply.

They should offer some reason for not publishing it, even if it's just to say 'what's the point, when it's all done and the submission was pretty much just the last one with a new date?'

If it was just the same as the previous then they would have released it.

 

[AlRawdah]

Omega Man, when referring to something that OLM posted on this website, you would be better off describing him as "one off the not606 board" rather than "one off the board of HCST" - the latter suggests you have a wish to imply that everything OLM posts on here (or perhaps just stuff you disagree with) is HCST opinion when it clearly is not.

On a wider point, I reckon this thread says precisely nothing about the positions of the OSC and HCST, and everything about the pathetic efforts of a handful of argumentative keyboard warrior dickheads.

 

[originallambrettaman]

This is so typical of you OLM. Its never you in the wrong.

"You'd hope (and expect) that City fans would respect the minute's applause, but the rest of the stuff is for the Brighton fans, it's really nothing to do with us."

"I was surprised that one of the board of the HCST implied that it was only for Brighton fans. The other person said that he too was surprised as he thought well of you."

If anyone is being a shabby **** its you.

We offered our condolences to the BHA Supporters Club and asked if we should provide a wreath. How that evolved over the next few days, was entirely led by "Brighton Fans" the football club and the families of all of the victims. The message for the whole day was "together".

What I said was perfectly reasonable and you attempting to use any reference to a memorial service to point score on a football message board is disgusting.

 

[Benjo]

I'm always happy to admit whenI've got things wrong, but you must be reading a different thread to me if you think OLM resurrected this thread as anything other than a pissing contest.

TOM was critical of the OSC, he raised it with them, and subsequently, those comments appear to be being addressed.

OLM raised this thead to point at those comments. Now if I've made a mistake, it's in assuming he was being critical, rather than as praise for the OSC being enlightened.

Which do you think it was?

Oh seriously just crawl into a hole somewhere.

 

[Benjo]

Oh seriously just crawl into a hole somewhere.

Go on then.

Tedious ****.

Such a ****ing bore you are.

 

[The Omega Man]

Who is it trying to score points! Please do tell me, why you felt the need to resurrect the post from 2012, what was that all about. If it isn't cheap point scoring from the ultimate scabby ****, who never admits to getting things wrong.

I do think it is quite odd that anyone who supports community involvement would post as you did and I still do. Seeing as you later "liked" a post from a Brighton fan thanking Hull fans.

Omega Man, when referring to something that OLM posted on this website, you would be better off describing him as "one off the not606 board" rather than "one off the board of HCST" - the latter suggests you have a wish to imply that everything OLM posts on here (or perhaps just stuff you disagree with) is HCST opinion when it clearly is not.

On a wider point, I reckon this thread says precisely nothing about the positions of the OSC and HCST, and everything about the pathetic efforts of a handful of argumentative keyboard warrior dickheads.

If I have a beef with the HCST, I will make it clear, nothing comes to mind at the moment, but perhaps I will dig around at all the posts ever made and see if I can find something, well no I wont as I feel that it would be petty and would not benefit anyone...

I did not set out to be in any way representative of the OSC board on here. OLM in fact posted that I was a director, I didn't feel the need. He finds it ironic that I was once critical of a supporter group. Why he felt he needed to do that this morning, I have no idea.

If I want to be an argumentative keyboard warrior dickhead, I will be, but he started it, miss!

 

[Sikkedogsvendestykke]

Any request made to the OSC has been ignored.

Sorry SCB, off topic, but that avatar of yours ... is it Barry Gibb?

 

[Brucebones]

Sorry SCB, off topic, but that avatar of yours ... is it Barry Gibb?

I think it's Grizzly Adams from the 70's TV show gentle Ben with a big bear in it.

 

[Sir Cheshire Ben]

Sorry SCB, off topic, but that avatar of yours ... is it Barry Gibb?

I think it's Grizzly Adams from the 70's TV show gentle Ben with a big bear in it.

No need to be sorry, this thread needs to stray.

It's not Barry Gibb, it's James "Grizzly Adams from the 70s Film & TV series "The Life & Times of Grizzly Adams". In the show Adams adopts a bear & names him Ben.

I believe "Gentle Ben" was a totally different series. Although both bears were named Ben.

Barry Gibb is the toothy, over serious & last remaining Bee Gee.

Grizzly.

You must log in or register to see media

Gentle

You must log in or register to see media

Barry (in the middle)

You must log in or register to see media