Except the ones that haven't. I can't answer why yours seem to fail to get a response. I agree, that's poor on their part. I'm not even a member, but they've called me a few times and had lengthy telephone conversations with a few on the board over issues I've raised with them over recent years. I didn't generally agree with what they were saying, but could usually understand why they said it. You seem to be asking about the submission. What answer or detail do you expect over and about over what's already been posted?
You know it was about the submission, but hey, you like to pick irrelevant holes. Any requests made directly to the OSC regarding their decision to keep the submission they made to the FA on their members behalf a secret have been ignored.
There is a comment about a discussion with an OSC Director on here which implies they were not ignored. They didn't seem to get a clear answer, and yes, they should at least offer some reason why it isn't published, and yes, they should respond to members queries on it rather than just seemingly responding to the select few.
If you mean by TOM, he's a two faced, attention seeking, lying **** who changes his mind to suit the level of importance he thinks he can attract. People who direct questions to the OSC should not have to come on here for a response. They are a self elected, back stabbing, back slapping body of ****s who only serve one purpose & that is to serve themselves & their own interests ignoring completely those who ask even the simplest of questions.
It's hard to imagine why you don't seem to get a reply. They should offer some reason for not publishing it, even if it's just to say 'what's the point, when it's all done and the submission was pretty much just the last one with a new date?'
As if you've just brought up the memorial service of people who tragically lost their lives to use as a stick to poke with. What a monumental bellend you are.
This is so typical of you OLM. Its never you in the wrong. "You'd hope (and expect) that City fans would respect the minute's applause, but the rest of the stuff is for the Brighton fans, it's really nothing to do with us." "I was surprised that one of the board of the HCST implied that it was only for Brighton fans. The other person said that he too was surprised as he thought well of you." If anyone is being a shabby **** its you. We offered our condolences to the BHA Supporters Club and asked if we should provide a wreath. How that evolved over the next few days, was entirely led by "Brighton Fans" the football club and the families of all of the victims. The message for the whole day was "together".
Omega Man, when referring to something that OLM posted on this website, you would be better off describing him as "one off the not606 board" rather than "one off the board of HCST" - the latter suggests you have a wish to imply that everything OLM posts on here (or perhaps just stuff you disagree with) is HCST opinion when it clearly is not. On a wider point, I reckon this thread says precisely nothing about the positions of the OSC and HCST, and everything about the pathetic efforts of a handful of argumentative keyboard warrior dickheads.
What I said was perfectly reasonable and you attempting to use any reference to a memorial service to point score on a football message board is disgusting.
Who is it trying to score points! Please do tell me, why you felt the need to resurrect the post from 2012, what was that all about. If it isn't cheap point scoring from the ultimate scabby ****, who never admits to getting things wrong. I do think it is quite odd that anyone who supports community involvement would post as you did and I still do. Seeing as you later "liked" a post from a Brighton fan thanking Hull fans. If I have a beef with the HCST, I will make it clear, nothing comes to mind at the moment, but perhaps I will dig around at all the posts ever made and see if I can find something, well no I wont as I feel that it would be petty and would not benefit anyone... I did not set out to be in any way representative of the OSC board on here. OLM in fact posted that I was a director, I didn't feel the need. He finds it ironic that I was once critical of a supporter group. Why he felt he needed to do that this morning, I have no idea. If I want to be an argumentative keyboard warrior dickhead, I will be, but he started it, miss!
No need to be sorry, this thread needs to stray. It's not Barry Gibb, it's James "Grizzly Adams from the 70s Film & TV series "The Life & Times of Grizzly Adams". In the show Adams adopts a bear & names him Ben. I believe "Gentle Ben" was a totally different series. Although both bears were named Ben. Barry Gibb is the toothy, over serious & last remaining Bee Gee. Grizzly. Gentle Barry (in the middle)
