Bruce Sack Watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bet Caulkin and Shearer have been telling them to give him his 1000th game as a send off, wouldn't be surprised.

As if you'd be mates with that ****ing ****er.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.
From what I've read elsewhere the Saudi's are a bit confused as they think Bruce should be sacked once they have his replacement set up, they don't get the caretaker manager aspect and they have to sign off on his sacking and pay off.

In other words they don't get the depth of hatred towards Bruce, understandable i suppose, but they have basically missed an open goal from a yard out if he's there on Sunday.
 
Say if we put in a worldie performance and stuff spurs, I hope this doesn’t make the new owners think “dya know what, he’ll do a job till January” you know what Bruce is like. He pulls out a result just as he’s about to get the sack. In a way I hope we lose so it puts the nail in the coffin.
 
Say if we put in a worldie performance and stuff spurs, I hope this doesn’t make the new owners think “dya know what, he’ll do a job till January” you know what Bruce is like. He pulls out a result just as he’s about to get the sack. In a way I hope we lose so it puts the nail in the coffin.
Or the latch on the suitcase.

It’s a concern. If he takes charge and wins. What then?