Bruce in - Bruce out

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Bruce in or Bruce out?

  • Bruce In

  • Bruce Out


Results are only viewable after voting.
If a Sunderland fan had posted this article people would have replied normally and had a debate about it, but because a Newcastle fan post it hes an arsehole?

If a similar article had been posted on the Skunks board by a Sunderland fan he would have received the same level of abuse and the mods would have probably removed it.
 
If a similar article had been posted on the Skunks board by a Sunderland fan he would have received the same level of abuse and the mods would have probably removed it.

I dont think that's true. There was no obvious wummery in the wording of the article.

It came from a lad who is genuinely interested to see the opinions of the local rivals, as to how they would like to see their club run...
 
Why don't you just **** off you useless ****.

Cest I am very disappointed in your response here.

As the OP is stating he can't be arsed to read posts on the subject and leads us to believe he is in no way on the WUM.
Of course giving his little brainless minions an excuse to pile in never crossed his tiny mind.

Normally your replies are longer and detailed.
I assume you were trying to be more concise?
IF so may I help?



You could have just wrote................

"**** off!" <ok>
 
If a similar article had been posted on the Skunks board by a Sunderland fan he would have received the same level of abuse and the mods would have probably removed it.

articles get moved because all we get is wums like psycho, when decent posters like blackcatsteve post we happily have a discussion with them <ok>
 
Badger's sound, Cheik's a bit of a woman.

Having a feeling the mags are tinkering with the vote.
 
Bent - 20 goals per season.

Gyan - 12 goals in his first season.

Welbeck - terrifyingly good. Chipped in with a few for your lot too.

FFWD

Wickham - no goals in sight.

Jing Dong Poo - has a worse goals to games ratio than none other than Lee Dong Gook does in the K-League, remember him? 23 and 0 for the Boro. Only 20 so could come good.

Bendtner - will get goals, but not as many as he did with better supply at Arsenal.

Sessegnon - not a striker, not a goal scorer, maybe get you 4/5 a year.

You're going to be missing about 20-25 goals a year there I'd say in comparison to the forwards you had at your disposal just 12 short months ago.

Take that amount of goals away from any team and you're in trouble, as far as your season objectives go.

Forget about Bruce for a minute, surely somebody did some research into these players before decisions were made? How has Super Niall allowed this to happen? Man Utd allowed 40+ goals to leave Old Trafford in 2009, guess what happened next...the title went hurtling towards Stamford Bridge, because he brought in only Michael Owen as a replacement. He then signed a 20 goals per season striker for £6m and the rest is history.

You got £20m for Jordan Henderson. You got £24m for Bent, probably £5m for Gyan for a loan for the season, plus maybe £8-10m when he leaves next year. Over £50m and your only goalscorer is on loan from Arsenal. How on earth is Niall Quinn doing a good job at Sunderland? You're deluded if you think the manager is pulling the strings at your club, that 7ft stack of useless turd is looking after Mr Short's investment and not even thinking about driving your club forward.
 
We can't seem to have a debate without abuse on here, nowadays. I know we're all a bit pissed off, but it's getting really tedious now.

As for the poll, I too think the mags have been at the "Bruce in" button, but I don't suppose we'll get to know. Could have been interesting though.
 
It's the fact that you are the biggest hypocrite going, and are one reason that a former moderator left his post.

This thread wasn't a WUM one, and I have been having some good debates with people on here in the past few days, but is once again ruined by a couple of posters. You have banged on for the majority of your time in your role that threads keep getting ruined by individuals, yet fail to recognise it when it's either yourself or one of your own.

But hey, who am I to criticise eh?

**** me, you bleat and whine more than Bruce!
Are you related?
 
I give up, all you mackems can enjoy your **** season, **** manager and **** attendances.

Give my regards to Barnsley.

Im not normally inclined to answer fools like you, but as an exception, sonny, dont be a keyboard warrior, you will be found out in the end, actually as a newby, you aint **** all are you? but behind the keyboard you are Captain Marval, in real life sunshine, just another gobshite chicken get.
 
Terry_Hardacre:1384084 said:
Bent - 20 goals per season.

Gyan - 12 goals in his first season.

Welbeck - terrifyingly good. Chipped in with a few for your lot too.

FFWD

Wickham - no goals in sight.

Jing Dong Poo - has a worse goals to games ratio than none other than Lee Dong Gook does in the K-League, remember him? 23 and 0 for the Boro. Only 20 so could come good.

Bendtner - will get goals, but not as many as he did with better supply at Arsenal.

Sessegnon - not a striker, not a goal scorer, maybe get you 4/5 a year.

You're going to be missing about 20-25 goals a year there I'd say in comparison to the forwards you had at your disposal just 12 short months ago.

Take that amount of goals away from any team and you're in trouble, as far as your season objectives go.

Forget about Bruce for a minute, surely somebody did some research into these players before decisions were made? How has Super Niall allowed this to happen? Man Utd allowed 40+ goals to leave Old Trafford in 2009, guess what happened next...the title went hurtling towards Stamford Bridge, because he brought in only Michael Owen as a replacement. He then signed a 20 goals per season striker for £6m and the rest is history.

You got £20m for Jordan Henderson. You got £24m for Bent, probably £5m for Gyan for a loan for the season, plus maybe £8-10m when he leaves next year. Over £50m and your only goalscorer is on loan from Arsenal. How on earth is Niall Quinn doing a good job at Sunderland? You're deluded if you think the manager is pulling the strings at your club, that 7ft stack of useless turd is looking after Mr Short's investment and not even thinking about driving your club forward.

Normally I think you're a total knob but in all honesty, there is actually a lot of this that merits applause. I find myself wanting to rubbish it but can't.

There is something behind the scenes not right but I think Niall is piggy in the middle, not the culprit. He is acting as the go between for manager and owner and is probably getting pulled from pillar to post currently. Bruce has badly let Quinn down imo and I think this could be leading to strained relations between short and himself and manager. They didn't seem to chatty last night to be honest.

This weekend will again be a huge affair and we will see if the player reactions mirror the managers words.

I'm not holding my breath that they can.