If a similar article had been posted on the Skunks board by a Sunderland fan he would have received the same level of abuse and the mods would have probably removed it.
I dont think that's true. There was no obvious wummery in the wording of the article. It came from a lad who is genuinely interested to see the opinions of the local rivals, as to how they would like to see their club run...
Cest I am very disappointed in your response here. As the OP is stating he can't be arsed to read posts on the subject and leads us to believe he is in no way on the WUM. Of course giving his little brainless minions an excuse to pile in never crossed his tiny mind. Normally your replies are longer and detailed. I assume you were trying to be more concise? IF so may I help? You could have just wrote................ "**** off!"
articles get moved because all we get is wums like psycho, when decent posters like blackcatsteve post we happily have a discussion with them
I give up, all you mackems can enjoy your **** season, **** manager and **** attendances. Give my regards to Barnsley.
Bent - 20 goals per season. Gyan - 12 goals in his first season. Welbeck - terrifyingly good. Chipped in with a few for your lot too. FFWD Wickham - no goals in sight. Jing Dong Poo - has a worse goals to games ratio than none other than Lee Dong Gook does in the K-League, remember him? 23 and 0 for the Boro. Only 20 so could come good. Bendtner - will get goals, but not as many as he did with better supply at Arsenal. Sessegnon - not a striker, not a goal scorer, maybe get you 4/5 a year. You're going to be missing about 20-25 goals a year there I'd say in comparison to the forwards you had at your disposal just 12 short months ago. Take that amount of goals away from any team and you're in trouble, as far as your season objectives go. Forget about Bruce for a minute, surely somebody did some research into these players before decisions were made? How has Super Niall allowed this to happen? Man Utd allowed 40+ goals to leave Old Trafford in 2009, guess what happened next...the title went hurtling towards Stamford Bridge, because he brought in only Michael Owen as a replacement. He then signed a 20 goals per season striker for £6m and the rest is history. You got £20m for Jordan Henderson. You got £24m for Bent, probably £5m for Gyan for a loan for the season, plus maybe £8-10m when he leaves next year. Over £50m and your only goalscorer is on loan from Arsenal. How on earth is Niall Quinn doing a good job at Sunderland? You're deluded if you think the manager is pulling the strings at your club, that 7ft stack of useless turd is looking after Mr Short's investment and not even thinking about driving your club forward.
We can't seem to have a debate without abuse on here, nowadays. I know we're all a bit pissed off, but it's getting really tedious now. As for the poll, I too think the mags have been at the "Bruce in" button, but I don't suppose we'll get to know. Could have been interesting though.
Im not normally inclined to answer fools like you, but as an exception, sonny, dont be a keyboard warrior, you will be found out in the end, actually as a newby, you aint **** all are you? but behind the keyboard you are Captain Marval, in real life sunshine, just another gobshite chicken get.
Normally I think you're a total knob but in all honesty, there is actually a lot of this that merits applause. I find myself wanting to rubbish it but can't. There is something behind the scenes not right but I think Niall is piggy in the middle, not the culprit. He is acting as the go between for manager and owner and is probably getting pulled from pillar to post currently. Bruce has badly let Quinn down imo and I think this could be leading to strained relations between short and himself and manager. They didn't seem to chatty last night to be honest. This weekend will again be a huge affair and we will see if the player reactions mirror the managers words. I'm not holding my breath that they can.
