I would respectfully point out that you are talking twaddle because you dont seem to understand the limitations of such a deal.
"Draft deal: A pledge that the UK will not be on the hook for future bail-outs of eurozone states - specifically, crisis measures to shore up the euro area "will not entail budgetary responsibility for member states whose currency is not the euro”. The is also a promise of “reimbursement” if a eurozone state rescue-measure calls on general EU funds. (p4 of draft agreement)
A statement noting that any member state, including the UK, can demand that any issue pertaining to the eurozone may be discussed in the European Council, which means all 28 member states. However the clause notes that such a request cannot “amount to allowing one or more member states to veto the effective management of the banking union or the future integration of the euro area” which begs the question over how 'safe' Mr Osborne's safeguard really makes non-eurozone states.
A mechanism whereby an unspecified number of non-euro states can “indicate their reasoned opposition” to a measure being proposed by the eurozone states, and an undertaking that the Council “shall discuss the issue”. The council also pledges to “do all in its power” to engineer a “satisfactory solution” to address the concerns and seek to facilitate “a wider basis of agreement in the Council”. [Draft statement on section A].
Crucially however the text gives no indication of what will happen if such an agreement cannot be reached."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...d-cameron-asked-for-and-what-he-actually-got/