She thinks a second referendum would be undemocratic but has accepted that it’s a damage limitation exercise. Fair enough.
Much as I would love a second referendum, I think having one would leave a very bitter taste in a lot of people’s mouths. And not just angry old gammon. Besides, further delaying any sort of decision just leaves business and the economy confronted with more uncertainty. There is absolutely no painless way out of this **** show, so yes, damage limitation is the best we can hope for.
Yeah, we pretty much do. Brexit is one of the stupidest things since stupid was invented. Why wait for Putin to cut your throat when you can do it yourself?
Same here. I think, the transition period allows time for an orderly exit and to negotiate the trade terms. The fuss over the backstop becomes moot if the solution that the Leavers say is possible becomes a reality. So overall, despite me being firmly Remain I’d take this to get it over with and we can move on.
It wouldn't do that. The Brexitards would continue to cry about it not being a proper Brexit and blame everyone else for it ****ing up.
I couldn’t give a **** what they say tbh, as every single one of them has proved to be a pointless and largely clueless gob on a stick, that when cornered run away, and when asked to provide a workable alternative - simply can’t. **** the gobshites. Some of the most gullible will continue to hang on their every word and parrot their bullshit, but the majority can now see through these pricks imo.
But they won't go away and this deal won't solve any issues over their divisiveness. Appeasement just makes them ask for more.
Gillian Keegan standing up to SKY's questioning, she's throwing it back at them without the bluster and supporting May, good on her but it took a woman to do it
Genuine question, what's your view on Mays deal, do you support it even if half-heartedly or you totally against it?
