Betz for Bantz
- Thread starter Spurlock
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Okay, same rules apply to you.
I want pictures as proof though
Yes I will change my avatar if you complete the challenge. Well done for having the stones mate!
If you take the bet, then the rules have to apply equally to you. Can't fassy ole your way out of that one.
That Liverpool defence is going to tear you a gaping chasm this season
If you take the bet, then the rules have to apply equally to you. Can't fassy ole your way out of that one.
That Liverpool defence is going to tear you a gaping chasm this season
Yes but PISKIE stop moving the goal posts, you know full well what the original bet was. Yet you don't have the stones? I'll change my avatar for one month, no probs.
You want a pussy bet, where you don’t have to adhere to the same rules ?
Thought you’d have bigger stones to be honest.
It's absolutely about that - it's just a fookin' avatar - not being stripped naked and publicly tarred and feathered ffs
Our own @AKCJ had to suffer an avatar change for a whole season after losing a bet with the Hull lads - no excuses, no crying off because they might take the piss... and if he hadn't kept his word he knew he would get absolute pelters from the rest of us Foxes. If you give it large you have to take it and without trying to change the original terms... them's the real rules of the jungle. Got nothing to do with 'support' but there should also be no 'special dispensations' or over indulgence, just because you share the same club loyalty.
Nope...Hiag doesn't want the bet...the usual suspects are unhappy about it
Anyway who doesn't want to bet till its finalised are welcome to back out. I've applied that rule to everyone.
I can prove it, can you prove that there is some kind of phantom bias going on here? Or are you still holding that same stick about 'club loyalty'. I could argue that Mr Marks was reluctant to bet....a bit of peer pressure got him to bet, as soon as there was a loop hole, he backed out. We could argue this but there is no argument. It wasn't finalised and he was within his rights. See I've let it go...but you....lol....trying to tell me it's club loyalty
Like I said the guy had no problem betting with Archie...but this bet with G4e smells of Goon/Chav **** with some Fox piss squirted allover it...who do you think your kidding? G4e tried to be smart with the wording....made Hiag suspicious of him, Hiag reacted...yes we get it...you don't like it. Plus your not listening to me...or you would understand. Hiag is like a red rag to a Fox...lets be honest.
That's patently clear bwi, he goes through the motions but in the end reneges on everything...Lack of stones I believe it's called.Nope...Hiag doesn't want the bet...the usual suspects are unhappy about it
Anyway who doesn't want to bet till its finalised are welcome to back out. I've applied that rule to everyone.
I can prove it, can you prove that there is some kind of phantom bias going on here? Or are you still holding that same stick about 'club loyalty'. I could argue that Mr Marks was reluctant to bet....a bit of peer pressure got him to bet, as soon as there was a loop hole, he backed out. We could argue this but there is no argument. It wasn't finalised and he was within his rights. See I've let it go...but you....lol....trying to tell me it's club loyalty
Like I said the guy had no problem betting with Archie...but this bet with G4e smells of Goon/Chav **** with some Fox piss squirted allover it...who do you think your kidding? G4e tried to be smart with the wording....made Hiag suspicious of him, Hiag reacted...yes we get it...you don't like it. Plus your not listening to me...or you would understand. Hiag is like a red rag to a Fox...lets be honest.
Spot on this.
Not so much this
HIAG is a bitter pleb to the foxes, and always has been.
Though Piskie trying to engineer some kind of situation where HIAG has welched is becoming a tad cringeworthy.
HIAG doesn't need any help looking a helmet Pisk, just let him run his mouth and he usually gets there by himself.
No Loophole bro, When I make a bet and the result is in the bet is paid in full at that time hence my astonishment when you backed out saying inasmuch you needed time to pay. I don't know what bookies you have bet with before but I'll bet you haven't had to wait for your bet to be weighed in. The bet still stands if you have the stones for it.Spot on this.
Not so much this
HIAG is a bitter pleb to the foxes, and always has been.
Though Piskie trying to engineer some kind of situation where HIAG has welched is becoming a tad cringeworthy.
HIAG doesn't need any help looking a helmet Pisk, just let him run his mouth and he usually gets there by himself.
Spot on this.
Not so much this
HIAG is a bitter pleb to the foxes, and always has been.
Though Piskie trying to engineer some kind of situation where HIAG has welched is becoming a tad cringeworthy.
HIAG doesn't need any help looking a helmet Pisk, just let him run his mouth and he usually gets there by himself.
G4e tried the same bet with me...the conversation is somewhere on this thread...I agreed to it thinking it is the same bet I had proposed..a straight shoot out of my team finishing above his. On closer inspection, which was a while later when I was writing it up, I noticed the little' I'll try to be smart' twist and I backed out. It's simple, two people bet...or they don't. No need to try to catch each other out ffs.
Anyway @FosseFilberto chats a lot...I don't see him participating though....thanks but I don't need his legal advice either lol. I'd rather call Saul.
No Loophole bro, When I make a bet and the result is in the bet is paid in full at that time hence my astonishment when you backed out saying inasmuch you needed time to pay. I don't know what bookies you have bet with before but I'll bet you haven't had to wait for your bet to be weighed in. The bet still stands if you have the stones for it.
I hope you are over the astonishment.
I don't know about you ****s but this jungle deals with a few currencies, likes, avatars, sigs..these are the monies we deal with. Let's be honest if we are choosing to bring real world laws into it then you would have a few tags at the very least and banged up, extradited etc etc...but you still here. So let's leave the real world rules where they belong. This was/is a simple bet thread with lots of fun to be had..zero problems...until now, I wonder why....actually I don't wonder, I'm wondering what to have for lunch.