If you take the bet, then the rules have to apply equally to you. Can't fassy ole your way out of that one. That Liverpool defence is going to tear you a gaping chasm this season
Yes but PISKIE stop moving the goal posts, you know full well what the original bet was. Yet you don't have the stones? I'll change my avatar for one month, no probs.
You want a pussy bet, where you don’t have to adhere to the same rules ? Thought you’d have bigger stones to be honest.
Nope...Hiag doesn't want the bet...the usual suspects are unhappy about it Anyway who doesn't want to bet till its finalised are welcome to back out. I've applied that rule to everyone. I can prove it, can you prove that there is some kind of phantom bias going on here? Or are you still holding that same stick about 'club loyalty'. I could argue that Mr Marks was reluctant to bet....a bit of peer pressure got him to bet, as soon as there was a loop hole, he backed out. We could argue this but there is no argument. It wasn't finalised and he was within his rights. See I've let it go...but you....lol....trying to tell me it's club loyalty Like I said the guy had no problem betting with Archie...but this bet with G4e smells of Goon/Chav **** with some Fox piss squirted allover it...who do you think your kidding? G4e tried to be smart with the wording....made Hiag suspicious of him, Hiag reacted...yes we get it...you don't like it. Plus your not listening to me...or you would understand. Hiag is like a red rag to a Fox...lets be honest.
That's patently clear bwi, he goes through the motions but in the end reneges on everything...Lack of stones I believe it's called.
Spot on this. Not so much this HIAG is a bitter pleb to the foxes, and always has been. Though Piskie trying to engineer some kind of situation where HIAG has welched is becoming a tad cringeworthy. HIAG doesn't need any help looking a helmet Pisk, just let him run his mouth and he usually gets there by himself.
No Loophole bro, When I make a bet and the result is in the bet is paid in full at that time hence my astonishment when you backed out saying inasmuch you needed time to pay. I don't know what bookies you have bet with before but I'll bet you haven't had to wait for your bet to be weighed in. The bet still stands if you have the stones for it.
G4e tried the same bet with me...the conversation is somewhere on this thread...I agreed to it thinking it is the same bet I had proposed..a straight shoot out of my team finishing above his. On closer inspection, which was a while later when I was writing it up, I noticed the little' I'll try to be smart' twist and I backed out. It's simple, two people bet...or they don't. No need to try to catch each other out ffs. Anyway @FosseFilberto chats a lot...I don't see him participating though....thanks but I don't need his legal advice either lol. I'd rather call Saul.
I hope you are over the astonishment. I don't know about you ****s but this jungle deals with a few currencies, likes, avatars, sigs..these are the monies we deal with. Let's be honest if we are choosing to bring real world laws into it then you would have a few tags at the very least and banged up, extradited etc etc...but you still here. So let's leave the real world rules where they belong. This was/is a simple bet thread with lots of fun to be had..zero problems...until now, I wonder why....actually I don't wonder, I'm wondering what to have for lunch.
