That prick labelling anyone a plastic is beyond ironic, as he's a Finnish based Irishman who's not been to Anfield in his ****ing life
Last edited:
#bbcsalford
- Thread starter astro
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
So Koeman didn't do better than Rodgers this year is what you're saying?
Nope, he did better because Brendan was in his third year
- May 22, 2011
- 73,783
- 25,709
- 113
Nope, he did better because Brendan was in his third year
So balotelli did better than RVP because it was his first year back in the prem?
Not the best comparison. Saints finished two points behind Liverpool. Balotelli scored 1 (one) league goal to Van Persie's 10!So balotelli did better than RVP because it was his first year back in the prem?
- May 22, 2011
- 73,783
- 25,709
- 113
But it was balotelli a first season back in the prem which apparently is a good enough excuse to do worse even if you are better
Not that much worse...But it was balotelli a first season back in the prem which apparently is a good enough excuse to do worse even if you are better
Since February Southampton have been on a downward spiral even Everton fans might think about questioning their club over
Games won each month by Southampton:
May 1/4 wins: Aston Villa (saving themselves for the FA Cup Final)
April 1/4 wins: Hull (relegated)
March 2/3 wins: Burnley (relegated) and Crystal Palace (Koeman admitted lucky)
February 1/5 wins: QPR (relegated)
[HASHTAG]#ouch[/HASHTAG]
Games won each month by Southampton:
May 1/4 wins: Aston Villa (saving themselves for the FA Cup Final)
April 1/4 wins: Hull (relegated)
March 2/3 wins: Burnley (relegated) and Crystal Palace (Koeman admitted lucky)
February 1/5 wins: QPR (relegated)
[HASHTAG]#ouch[/HASHTAG]
Nope, he did better because Brendan was in his third year
How is less points better? It's a bit like saying global warming is cooling the planet
So Rafa did better than Fergie in 2008 coming in second to United because Fergie was managing United longer
Interesting logic
Brod only took 6 points from Koeman this season just gone, that makes Koeman better of course
Yet you all claim Southampton did better
[HASHTAG]#mathsfail[/HASHTAG]
Saints had a better season than Liverpool, perhaps not from a points perspective but certainly from an expectation perspective. Liverpool's ambitions were top 4 and potentially a title challenge with their strike force which was second only to City's. Saints went into the season concerned that a new manager and the loss of five key players could mean a hard year but they outperformed all expectations. There's no doubt which manager had the better season and it wasn't Del Boy Rodgers!
I admire your support of Brent. I am a big fan and hope he stays at Anfield for years to come. He's perfect for Liverpool.Brod only took 6 points from Koeman this season just gone, that makes Koeman better of course
You mistake actual fact for "support". It's like saying "it's raining today" when it rains, by your logic meaning you "support rain"
[HASHTAG]#simpleton[/HASHTAG]
The points say differently albeit marginally, but only because of such an unexpected end of season collapse by Liverpool, Southamptons end of season collapse was expected. Southampton should have done much better tho, given the decent squad they have, they could have finished 4th with a better manager, be thankful they and Liverpool collapsed, you should be.
So, Liverpool have done worse and Southampton have done as expected. Liverpool still ended up with more points given such a disasterous season.
How that translates into Southampton doing "better" in the league is beyond any factual reasoning and credible logic. It is par for the Shteve course tho.
Funny how you lot keep saying for years "the table never lies" until it suits you to say otherwise.
Southampton's greatest season ever is still worse than Liverpool's worst season ever
[HASHTAG]#mindthegap[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#mindthegap[/HASHTAG]
I see. So you're going with the logic of a nine year old fan then. Brent beat Koeman twice this season so he's the superior manager. LVG beat Brent twice this season so he's even more superior. Gary Monk beat LVG twice so he's super superior. But then Brent beat Monk so it's suddenly got confusing.You mistake actual fact for "support". It's like saying "it's raining today" when it rains, by your logic meaning you "support rain"
[HASHTAG]#simpleton[/HASHTAG]
Anyway, the key thing is that Brent has to stay at Liverpool and finish the job he's doing so well.
You forgot Spurs who finished above you. You always forget Spurs. It's almost like you think you finished 5th which you didn't as you lost your last two games 3-1 at home and 6-1 away. Stevie Me's glorious send off!
Very few predicted Saints would finish 7th this season. Most were tipping them for a relegation scrap after their player exodus.
Liverpool obviously had a dreadful season under a hopeless manager. No point sugar coating a turd.
You're gloating about finishing two points ahead of a team who you gave £50million to last summer! It wasn't supposed to turn out this way when you jumped on the European Cup bandwagon!
7th isn't surprising for the 8th most expensive squad in the league plus Martinez doing what he does best
You don't need to be a [HASHTAG]#footballgenius[/HASHTAG] but it helps