Barmby suspended

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I would love to get paid for posting but I am afraid I am just another interested observer. I only stumbled across this forum when I heard that NB had been suspended and I looked on Google to see why. People were posting such tosh that I felt the need to respond. I don't do PR but I do run a local business. So it's no surprise that I would take a business view.

Sorry, another conspiracy theory debunked.

As a Businessman, please square this staement,

"When we acquired the football club we made it clear we would run it in accordance with sound and proper business principles and procedures."

with p*ssing off your customers with a passion and a vengeance.

If cutns could fly the Allams would be at least Wing Commanders.
 
So, considering that you've defended the Allams at every opportunity you have ever had (prior to yesterday), are you admitting you were wrong? BTW I'm not being arsey and smug here - I appreciate it could read like that - I'm interested if your opinion has flipped 360 degrees in the space of 24 hours.

That's not entirely true, I've always said Assem was bonkers, he's just turned out to be even more bonkers than I thought he was.

What I contested, was the nonsense about him wanting to build a housing estate down Walton Street and opinion certainly hasn't changed. The fact is that he did save the club and for that I remain grateful, unfortunately, he now seems intent on ****ing it all up again.
 
That's not entirely true, I've always said Assem was bonkers, he's just turned out to be even more bonkers than I thought he was.

What I contested, was the nonsense about him wanting to build a housing estate down Walton Street and opinion certainly hasn't changed. The fact is that he did save the club and for that I remain grateful, unfortunately, he now seems intent on ****ing it all up again.

And whenever anyone questionned his lack of backing for Nick in the transfer market you towed the line about him investing £51m and that being enough, whereas now you're criticising him for his farcical token backing of Nick in January.
 
You must log in or register to see images
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2012-05-01 at 13.21.06.jpg
    Screen shot 2012-05-01 at 13.21.06.jpg
    20.8 KB · Views: 11
The fact is that he did save the club and for that I remain grateful, unfortunately, he now seems intent on ****ing it all up again.

Every bad Chairman, politician, businessman and general ****o in history uses this line "I saved you". It engenders submission and a feeling of indebtedness. There are still people who let Bates off the leash because he 'saved' us, and people who made apologies for Briatore at QPR because he did the same, and so on.

'Bout time the fans started running football in this country. I used to think you were a great example of a club with local owners who cared about the club and the city, investing sensibly but not disproportionately in the team and generally looking like you were playing securely above your level. But greed and power yet again corrupt.
 
Anyone hear the clown on sportstalk who was saying Barmby has effectively talked himself out of a job, and he's right to be sacked/suspended? Not sure I concur with people on the radio saying that they won't go to city again, we stick to the club through thick and thin.

you mean thin and thin! <doh>
 
And whenever anyone questionned his lack of backing for Nick in the transfer market you towed the line about him investing £51m and that being enough, whereas now you're criticising him for his farcical token backing of Nick in January.

I made it quite clear on here that Nick didn't get the backing he wanted in January, I did say that considering they'd bunged in over £50m already, that was fair enough, they just shouldn't have said they were going to back him in the press conference when he took the job. Subsequently, they've sacked the best football man at the club and sacked a popular manager and there's other things that are yet to come out which are equally clueless.

Has my opinion on them changed?

Yes, they quite obviously don't know what they're doing.

But I certainly never thought Assem was an angel, I am well aware of his previous business dealings, I'm aware that he's awkward and unreasonable. None of that is a surprise, what is a surprise, is that someone who by his own admission knows **** all about football, just sacked one of the best in the business.
 
Every bad Chairman, politician, businessman and general ****o in history uses this line "I saved you". It engenders submission and a feeling of indebtedness. There are still people who let Bates off the leash because he 'saved' us, and people who made apologies for Briatore at QPR because he did the same, and so on.

'Bout time the fans started running football in this country. I used to think you were a great example of a club with local owners who cared about the club and the city, investing sensibly but not disproportionately in the team and generally looking like you were playing securely above your level. But greed and power yet again corrupt.

I hate mentioning it but this has reminded me of comments Lloyd made around 1998 about how he's put £2million into the club, yet all City fans are totally ungrateful to him. And how he would not be putting 1p more into it etc. I know we're not at those depths at the moment and I'm probably just paranoid. But still, it sort of seems eerily familiar.
 
And whenever anyone questionned his lack of backing for Nick in the transfer market you towed the line about him investing £51m and that being enough, whereas now you're criticising him for his farcical token backing of Nick in January.

Isn't it 'toed' the line?