Assem Allam on meeting with supporters re name change.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
He paid the creditors but Hull City still owe the money, to Allamhouse. If he puts the club into liquidation he loses £66 million. The money may not be his, but could belong to other family members or be part of a trust fund.

It may be that the Premier League don't care, but they issued a press statement saying that our club is called Hull City and they had not received a request to change it. Assem Allam now says he's already changed it. I wonder if the Premier League mind one of its members ripping up its rule book and doing what it likes.

press release relating to company name (which we all knew anyway) or football club name .. be careful because he will be looking and laughing at this without a doubt

he is taking the piss .. no matter what you think or think you can do .. it will happen .. sorry to say but it comes down to one fact .. money .. do you have 66 mill spare ?
 
I'm totally against the 'Americanisation' of the game ... everything from 'cheerleaders' to music at football matches, it sickens me.

It's not just football though.

I live in France and, when I come back to the UK, I see young people 'speaking' American slang, dressing like ****e-arsed little gangsters and 'whooping' instead of cheering.

Sadly, for older people who favour tradition, it's a losing battle. Whatever you do it won't won't work if money and power is involved.

Everyone knew what was happening at Portsmouth but, as long as there was enough money swilling around for all the pigs to dip their snout in, it was all ignored.

Talk of boycotts is laughable. Cardiff supporters, or Hull for that matter, won't boycott a winning team or a team in a higher position than usual.
The owners know they have the supporters by the bollocks and will pay lip service to your campaigns and protests because only a tiny minority will actually do anything.

It may make some feel pro-active and courageous to form little campaign groups but it won't do anything but make them feel important.
In reality they'll accomplish nothing.

My support for my club hasn't faltered in 40 years but these days I choose to ignore everything I can't change and enjoy what I still can.
I couldn't care less about the owner, manager or players.

I support the shirt, the history and the other supporters. When I go to the game I use the same old pubs & working mens clubs, have a few pints with decent people and shout my head off in the ground.

If they want to call my club the Dolphins or the Kestrels I couldn't give a shiney ****e ......... I know what it means to me and they can't ever talk that away from me.



And what's wrong with cheerleaders?

Wouldn't mind having the Crystal Palace girls jigging up and down at half time rather than watching some fat **** push a giant football around for a legalised loan shark company.
 
press release relating to company name (which we all knew anyway) or football club name .. be careful because he will be looking and laughing at this without a doubt

he is taking the piss .. no matter what you think or think you can do .. it will happen .. sorry to say but it comes down to one fact .. money .. do you have 66 mill spare ?

The Hull City money came out of Egypt, as you already know having read David Conn's Guardian article. The club statement says the club's name is Hull City Tigers. If what you say is true I'm surprised our football club doesn't know the difference between the company name and the club name.

It does come down to money Assem Allam hopes, on the back of no research, that changing the name will have millions pouring into Hull as if by magic.

Even if I did have £66 million he wouldn't sell because he wants to be the first owner that gave us European football. He's not going to sell unless he's forced to.

Finally I'm sure he's not laughing at what I write because he wouldn't care enough to read it.
 
press release relating to company name (which we all knew anyway) or football club name .. be careful because he will be looking and laughing at this without a doubt

he is taking the piss .. no matter what you think or think you can do .. it will happen .. sorry to say but it comes down to one fact .. money .. do you have 66 mill spare ?

Bates got burned messing with the football share, and it was more because of time restraints he got away with it. Hull City Tigers have no automatic right to play in the league pyramid. Hull City AFC do.
 
He paid the creditors but Hull City still owe the money, to Allamhouse. If he puts the club into liquidation he loses £66 million. The money may not be his, but could belong to other family members or be part of a trust fund.

It may be that the Premier League don't care, but they issued a press statement saying that our club is called Hull City and they had not received a request to change it. Assem Allam now says he's already changed it. I wonder if the Premier League mind one of its members ripping up its rule book and doing what it likes.

I think mountains are being made of molehills with regards what Allam said. If what they said in the statement was factually incorrect and punishable, the clubs legal team would never have let it be published. By all accounts anyway, we are already known as Hull City Tigers abroad, as anyone who has watched us on a foreign stream this season will be able to testify.

As for the money, assuming EPL survival there's £60m TV money for next season, whatever prize money we win this season and players to sell on top. He can recall his cash in one go, or make a small loss at the very least, if he so wishes.
 
I think mountains are being made of molehills with regards what Allam said. If what they said in the statement was factually incorrect and punishable, the clubs legal team would never have let it be published. By all accounts anyway, we are already known as Hull City Tigers abroad, as anyone who has watched us on a foreign stream this season will be able to testify.

As for the money, assuming EPL survival there's £60m TV money for next season, whatever prize money we win this season and players to sell on top. He can recall his cash in one go, or make a small loss at the very least, if he so wishes.

It's madness though. He could just squeeze it through before he has to hand things to Ehab, who seemingly doesn't like the idea and is liable to sell up anyway.

A lot of effort to go down in club history as a fruitcake, especially after all the good work he's done.
 
[/B]

...I have never bought into all this "I am wonderful" thing. All his charity work he does because he can afford to do it but he is driven solely by his own ego. Why else would he call himself Doctor, he bought that name. He may be good in his business world but like I said a long time ago I have spoken to people who he has trodden on on the way to where he is now. Hate to say it but the way I feel now I can see he will take this club down. Aluko has rejected a deal, why. I just think he is capable of a bust up with anyone including Steve Bruce and I can never rest easy whilst AA is the owner of this club...

A law unto himself. Wonder what really happened with the Shane Long deal in August???
 
Bates got burned messing with the football share, and it was more because of time restraints he got away with it. Hull City Tigers have no automatic right to play in the league pyramid. Hull City AFC do.

Don't be silly, a rename doesn't make it a new club. It makes it the same club under a new name. If what you say was the case, any company who falls into a spot f bother would just change their name and free themselves of any thingymajigs.
 
Smug,

The one thing that is really hard for us as supporters is that we owe the owner a great debt of gratitude and at the same time many oppose a change to the clubs name.
Like Darlington we do not own our stadium and that is the bigger issue.
 
Don't be silly, a rename doesn't make it a new club. It makes it the same club under a new name. If what you say was the case, any company who falls into a spot f bother would just change their name and free themselves of any thingymajigs.

Not really, that would be the Company name and, closing and renaming to avoid debts and liabilities is what some companies do as a matter of routine. The so called 'golden share', which sounds Wonkaesque, is the bit that the club the company owns needs to be part of the football pyramid. In Bates case, for a period of time he had all the players and assets in a company with no golden share, and nothing at all in what is effectively the football club. It's why the got docked points for exceptional circumstance, or whatever the term was.
 
Don't be silly, a rename doesn't make it a new club. It makes it the same club under a new name. If what you say was the case, any company who falls into a spot f bother would just change their name and free themselves of any thingymajigs.

That's true, for a limited company anyway. The owners are only liable for the amount they invest.
 
Not really, that would be the Company name and, closing and renaming to avoid debts and liabilities is what some companies do as a matter of routine. The so called 'golden share', which sounds Wonkaesque, is the bit that the club the company owns needs to be part of the football pyramid. In Bates case, for a period of time he had all the players and assets in a company with no golden share, and nothing at all in what is effectively the football club. It's why the got docked points for exceptional circumstance, or whatever the term was.

company name has been hull city tigers since march ... sorry and all that
 
We're not doing as you say though Dutch, were not closing and renaming, were just renaming. Closing and renaming would be akin to what's happened at Rangers, we'd have to start from the bottom.
 
We're not doing as you say though Dutch, were not closing and renaming, were just renaming. Closing and renaming would be akin to what's happened at Rangers, we'd have to start from the bottom.

exactly this