he was late and very forcefulWhat, go for a header?
Technically every header is dangerous and reckless no matter where or when it happens.
like his head against mason
in both cases he just flew in without a realistic chance of heading the ball
he was late and very forcefulWhat, go for a header?
Technically every header is dangerous and reckless no matter where or when it happens.
he was late and very forceful
like his head against mason
in both cases he just flew in without a realistic chance of heading the ball
you got that wrongMaybe from his view he did have a realistic chance of heading the ball. You can't say for certain.
Though, considering you said he was "he was up to his tricks again yesterday afternoon", you obviously think he did it with intent.
he was late and very forceful
like his head against mason
in both cases he just flew in without a realistic chance of heading the ball
Agreed he was very, very reckless. Not only was he very late with the challenge and the ball had been headed away by Ryan Mason, but not once was he looking at the ball as shown by the series of photographs on Google. I am not sure he was even given even a yellow card and to add insult to injury (!!!!) he scored later in the game.you got that wrong
I didnt think he did it with intent
I think he was reckless
Mason was in a clear position to head the ball. Cahill could never have headed the ball because he was behind him. Mason headed the ball clear and then a tenth of a second later Cahill hit him. I was in the corner with a perfect view.That's rubbish, Mason took the ball away from him, it was nothing more than a very unfortunate accident, with terrible consequences.
Mason was in a clear position to head the ball. Cahill could never have headed the ball because he was behind him. Mason headed the ball clear and then a tenth of a second later Cahill hit him. I was in the corner with a perfect view.
On Sunday it was very similar. Cahill flew in from behind the man and his head hit the back of the other players head. There was no other outcome possible.
If players go for a header from different angles there's always a chance of a collision but if a player jumps from behind another player and can only get the ball at the expense of hitting the player in front of him it is dangerous.
But it was obvious Mason would get there. Look at the video I posted. The second view shows how late Cahill was.If Mason hadn't got there, Cahill might well have done, it was a genuine attempt to head the ball...
You must log in or register to see media
From BBCSon's red card has been overturned.
Probably the right outcome but I'd still support Atkinson's decision on the day.From BBC
Tottenham forward Son Heung-min red card for tackle on Andre Gomes overturned
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50309594
But it was obvious Mason would get there. Look at the video I posted. The second view shows how late Cahill was.
His decision was a yellow card, it was in his hand for many many seconds, he should be made to publically explain why he then pulled a red one out.Probably the right outcome but I'd still support Atkinson's decision on the day.
Atkinson played to the gallery. He was influenced by the crowd and players reaction and probably after seeing the extent of the injury.His decision was a yellow card, it was in his hand for many many seconds, he should be made to publically explain why he then pulled a red one out.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Agreed. And did he really have to celebrate the goal?We’ve had this debate before. personally I think Cahill did him.
Ive never seen anyone go for a header like that.
Others disagree.
For heaven's sake why should he explain his actions to you? I expect the FA asked him the question, they overturned the red. End of.His decision was a yellow card, it was in his hand for many many seconds, he should be made to publically explain why he then pulled a red one out.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.