Did they name that island after City's Cyrus Christie ?I agree in principle....buuuuut.....isn't Peter Andre from Cyrus not ****ing Iceland LMFAO![]()
Did they name that island after City's Cyrus Christie ?I agree in principle....buuuuut.....isn't Peter Andre from Cyrus not ****ing Iceland LMFAO![]()

I reckon Aunty Janice had built up a fair few reasons to really savour this moment.
You must log in or register to see media

->Frig knows who was singing the Canadian anthem at the GP just now. He looked like a Super Mario tribute act.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
-> Maybe it had been doctored?
Maybe he's had surgery?
(I don't care if nobody's joining in)
There's some 'interesting' comments from Canadians there.You must log in or register to see media
Not so visible in parliament, and at PMQ's, when the Post Office scandal came to a head.You must log in or register to see media
I know I get close to the political line sometimes, but I do agree with this so have no issue with things getting deleted if need be.A gentle reminder about the no politics, no religion rule.
It's not just a whim of the mods, it was requested by the board users. I personally think it's a good thing, as it just become fractious and leaks in to other threads, but that's just my view.
If someone wants to run a poll to see if the general view of board users has changed, feel free, but until then, it still stands.
Ta muchly.
Interesting!A gentle reminder about the no politics, no religion rule.
It's not just a whim of the mods, it was requested by the board users. I personally think it's a good thing, as it just become fractious and leaks in to other threads, but that's just my view.
If someone wants to run a poll to see if the general view of board users has changed, feel free, but until then, it still stands.
Ta muchly.
Interesting!
I always thought it was a rule of not 606 which if we didn't comply then this board risks getting taken down?
Is that actually not case? Is it really a rule from an earlier request from some users, supported since by our own mods?
Personally I think there should be threads on here that allow political and religious discussion, but set up so as to lessen the chances of football threads getting hijacked.
Interesting!
I always thought it was a rule of not 606 which if we didn't comply then this board risks getting taken down?
Is that actually not the case? Is it really a rule from an earlier request from some users, supported since by our own mods?
Personally I think there should be threads on here that allow political and religious discussion, but set up so as to lessen the chances of football threads getting hijacked.
I don'tInteresting!
I always thought it was a rule of not 606 which if we didn't comply then this board risks getting taken down?
Is that actually not the case? Is it really a rule from an earlier request from some users, supported since by our own mods?
Personally I think there should be threads on here that allow political and religious discussion, but set up so as to lessen the chances of football threads getting hijacked.
If its not your board why are you taking my direct debit every month?...It's not a rule for the whole network. Several other forums on here have political threads and discussions on religion.
It was something requested by board users, although I confess I can't recall exactly how that came about, but I do feel it makes this board better for having it, but it's not my board, it belongs to the users.
If its not your board why are you taking my direct debit every month?...
Have what for free?Apart from you being one of the few daft enough to still pay it, it's because I can't show favoritism. Can you imagine the uproar if I let some people have it for free?