Off Topic And Now for Something Completely Different

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Duke of York strenuously denies he had ten thousand men

You must log in or register to see images

Buckingham Palace has issued a strong denial that the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, has been involved in bizarre hill marching based sexual practices.

According to reports up to ten thousand men are alleged to have been involved in incidents involving the Duke.

One participant, who cannot be named for legal reasons said “Me and loads of other guys were offered money to dress up in early 19th century uniforms and then march to the top of a hill.

“When we got there we were greeted by an extremely ‘excited’ Prince Andrew. He was very giggly now I think about it.

“Then, just when we thought it was all over, he seemed keen to make us march all the way back down again.”

Another man, who also claims to have been involved claimed, “He was quite firm about it, when we were up we were up and when we were down we were down.”

Denying the claims a Buckingham Palace spokesman told us, “All allegations in this matter are false, and records will clearly show these men were neither up nor down.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber, Baldrick's Cunning Plan, dennisboothstash and 6 others
DMD said:
Duke of York strenuously denies he had ten thousand men

You must log in or register to see images

Buckingham Palace has issued a strong denial that the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, has been involved in bizarre hill marching based sexual practices.

According to reports up to ten thousand men are alleged to have been involved in incidents involving the Duke.

One participant, who cannot be named for legal reasons said “Me and loads of other guys were offered money to dress up in early 19th century uniforms and then march to the top of a hill.

“When we got there we were greeted by an extremely ‘excited’ Prince Andrew. He was very giggly now I think about it.

“Then, just when we thought it was all over, he seemed keen to make us march all the way back down again.”

Another man, who also claims to have been involved claimed, “He was quite firm about it, when we were up we were up and when we were down we were down.”

Denying the claims a Buckingham Palace spokesman told us, “All allegations in this matter are false, and records will clearly show these men were neither up nor down.”
Click to expand...
Technically, if you're up the hill, you're up the hill, even if you're only half way up.

If you're down the hill, well you're not up the hill.

If I said to you, 'look at that bloke up the hill' and he happened to be only half way up, you wouldn't argue with my comment.

If said the same thing about a bloke at the bottom of a hill, you'd say something like, 'Are you Mr Hatem, by any chance?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chazz Rheinhold and DMD
Kempton said:
Technically, if you're up the hill, you're up the hill, even if you're only half way up.

If you're down the hill, well you're not up the hill.

If I said to you, 'look at that bloke up the hill' and he happened to be only half way up, you wouldn't argue with my comment.

If said the same thing about a bloke at the bottom of a hill, you'd say something like, 'Are you Mr Hatem, by any chance?
Click to expand...

Pfft, get over it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
Kempton said:
Technically, if you're up the hill, you're up the hill, even if you're only half way up.

If you're down the hill, well you're not up the hill.

If I said to you, 'look at that bloke up the hill' and he happened to be only half way up, you wouldn't argue with my comment.

If said the same thing about a bloke at the bottom of a hill, you'd say something like, 'Are you Mr Hatem, by any chance?
Click to expand...
But what if you was stood at the top of the said hill. Wouldn’t you then say Look at that bloke half way down the hill.... yet he hasn’t moved. To complicate it even more, what if you was on your phone to another person at the bottom referencing the same person, He would then be “neither Up nor Down”

And while we are at it, whats this about little boy blue blowing his horn? What is he a flaming contortionist? <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber, Kempton and DMD
DMD said:
Duke of York strenuously denies he had ten thousand men

You must log in or register to see images

Buckingham Palace has issued a strong denial that the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, has been involved in bizarre hill marching based sexual practices.

According to reports up to ten thousand men are alleged to have been involved in incidents involving the Duke.

One participant, who cannot be named for legal reasons said “Me and loads of other guys were offered money to dress up in early 19th century uniforms and then march to the top of a hill.

“When we got there we were greeted by an extremely ‘excited’ Prince Andrew. He was very giggly now I think about it.

“Then, just when we thought it was all over, he seemed keen to make us march all the way back down again.”

Another man, who also claims to have been involved claimed, “He was quite firm about it, when we were up we were up and when we were down we were down.”

Denying the claims a Buckingham Palace spokesman told us, “All allegations in this matter are false, and records will clearly show these men were neither up nor down.”
Click to expand...
I fancied going on that march when I heard money was on offer but Buckingham Palace couldn't guarantee I wouldn't get rogered when I got to the top of the hill. Sod that for a lark.
 
Had to laugh when I saw this. Not an oily rag or a spanner in sight!

You must log in or register to see media
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back