Off Topic Airco for All
- Thread starter Obadiah
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I get the impression you like being angry all the time.COTM nomination right there.
Obviously he'll lose to Allam, but he at least deserves to be on the list.
That's really not healthy.
You should seek help.
Whatever Alan Johnson did seems to have done the trick. Wonder if the council writing to the Premier League had any bearing on their U-turn. Well done whoever it was that's convinced them to allow a delay on the pitch build.
It's great that by giving Allam his own way yet again, the situation looks like it might be resolved. Doesn't change the fact that when he doesn't get his way he's an absolute ruthless ****. There'll be another time when he doesn't get his way, and once again someone will be made to pay.
It's great that by giving Allam his own way yet again, the situation looks like it might be resolved. Doesn't change the fact that when he doesn't get his way he's an absolute ruthless ****. There'll be another time when he doesn't get his way, and once again someone will be made to pay.
pudseytiger
Well-Known Member
Be interesting to see how long it takes to get planning permission, plus there's more than an outside chance of objector's, hope it work out for all the party's concerned.
Last edited:
pudseytiger
Well-Known Member
Presumably you mean because they're doing it on the existing astroturf pitches?
You would think a big blow up pitch would more attractive for Airco to sponsor?!
The plan four or five years ago was to build a 3g dome over the water based astro turf pitch which is used for 6 a side footy and hockey but it never materialised. I forget why. They should have gone ahead in my opinion.
I know the hockey teams complained at the time that they would have nowhere else to go. The sand based pitch and the water based pitch at the kc; and the pitch at Hul Uni I think are the only pitches left in Hull suitable for hockey. They only build 3g or 4g pitches at Schools now. The one at Endeavour High is rotting away nicely.
That all said, the sand pitch at Uni is massively under used.
Could the just build on that wasted grassed space between the North stand and the current pitches?
I know the hockey teams complained at the time that they would have nowhere else to go. The sand based pitch and the water based pitch at the kc; and the pitch at Hul Uni I think are the only pitches left in Hull suitable for hockey. They only build 3g or 4g pitches at Schools now. The one at Endeavour High is rotting away nicely.
That all said, the sand pitch at Uni is massively under used.
Could the just build on that wasted grassed space between the North stand and the current pitches?
Last edited:
No apology from me, no over reaction either.
As I have said previously. Hull City needed a tenancy agreement valid for a year. With Hull City Council saying the SMC couldn't grant a tenancy under the terms of the lease the application was always likely to be rejected.
I wonder if Hull City Council are putting their hands in their pockets towards the costs. After all Assem Allam did say if they built an indoor pitch the Airco Arena would be free for community use.
Last edited:
E.T.C sports:-
"Football Hockey Combination surface
This is a 3G multisurface that is ideal where the client wants to play football and hockey. It is a 40mm pile sand and rubber field surface laid on a 15mm shock pad".
Does a bubble pitch mean all supporters get hearded to and from games there by WYP ?
If it was "permitted development" they wouldn't need to make a planning application although they may have to satisfy certain restrictions and also building regulation approval would have to be considered.?
PART 12DEVELOPMENT BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES
Class A
A. Permitted development
The erection or construction and the maintenance, improvement or other alteration by a local authority or by an urban development corporation of—
(a)any small ancillary building, works or equipment on land belonging to or maintained by them required for the purposes of any function exercised by them on that land otherwise than as statutory undertakers;
(b)lamp standards, information kiosks, passenger shelters, public shelters and seats, telephone boxes, fire alarms, public drinking fountains, horse troughs, refuse bins or baskets, barriers for the control of people waiting to enter public service vehicles, and similar structures or works required in connection with the operation of any public service administered by them.
A.1 Interpretation of Class A
For the purposes of Class A—
- “urban development corporation” has the same meaning as in Part XVI of the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980(4) (urban development).
