agnostics??
- Thread starter thefanwithnoname
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
not sure what you are asking tbh
I thought it was clear. some things are predetermined. then there is free will
wealth and poverty need defining themselves. In the sense that if you take your sweets example. the kid eating ten may think he is 'wealthy' but if his teeth rot is he?
Still no answer, then?
Scared, are we?
deflect deflect deflect
not as scared as you are of going to the source
now let the adults talk
pussy
Deflect from what?
You haven't asked me anything, you ridiculous twat!
Oh, going back to The Sauce again, are we?
Does he like it when you call him that?
I think that's one question that he'd definitely dodge!
He's good at that though, just like he's good at dodging work.
Ok, we'll go back to your initial point: you said that Allah predetermines how you die and how wealthy you get, and gave an example of the person getting £2, which was predetermined, though quite how he got it was up to him.
My point is that, considering the hardship and extreme poverty in the world, did Allah predetermine that this would happen or did he give free will to some in order to allow them to crush the free will of others? It's insulting to suggest the starving of Ethiopia are exercising their free will by staying and dying, and callous to suggest they are in their position because Allah predetermined it. It's also naive to suggest that freedom is something portioned out equally to all, because the freedom Paris Hilton has far outweighs the freedom a child dying of starvation has.
**** me you are one thick twat.
**** off sonny and play with the sockets.
Has STD groomed you?
Wow, that's some real insight there, you stupid old ****.
It's probably not a surprise that you've brought up grooming, though.
It's an offence you know, you dirty old ponce.
And you've still failed to provide any sensible reason why he'd answer me, rather than dodging the question or refusing to answer, as he's been demonstrated to do.
I suppose that you think that I should take it on faith, but that would be ludicrous, wouldn't it?
