Two way teaches us nothing. Decide who is guilty and lynch the bastard, that's how this works.I think we need to stick Gerrez and Tobes in a two way tomorrow lads.
Two way teaches us nothing. Decide who is guilty and lynch the bastard, that's how this works.I think we need to stick Gerrez and Tobes in a two way tomorrow lads.
Haha so you're saying you were forced to kill IBWT, ok mate![]()
Leaping to the defence of Gerrez lol shocker that.no lets investigate him...
If nobody contradicts your role you have a duty to clean kill tobes.
This is the only thing that bothers me.
I can believe Valley is psychic and saw Tobes and MITO, and that MITO investigated Sir Tennisball. In general, the information presented on the thread is usually accurate, so unless the Mafia have some secret ability to interfere with information, like hacking the paper, we have to assume that Tobes is dodgy, MITO killed someone and Sir Tennisball is probably Mafia.
MITO's story about being forced to kill by the Mafia is more suspicious, as it is in response to being fingered himself, but ultimately still plausible if that is the Mafia's hidden power.
The big question is why our two most powerful remaining town roles have revealed themselves to the Mafia and cartel. If they are telling the truth, it's almost certain now that one of them will die or be recruited.
only someone calming to be the psychic can stop this now. I think.
I think we need to stick Gerrez and Tobes in a two way tomorrow lads.


We need to lynch the person that will tell us the most.
Even if he isn't, you let everyone think that and made him come out which means 2 of our detectives are out in the open now (if you're both telling the truth).
Ok, something isn't adding up here. My scooby senses are making me suspicious of both MITO and Valley now. But that makes no sense as Valley is fingering MITO (dirty bugger).
My biggest concern with MITO is that he comes out and sacrifices himself and then suggests we lynch/kill everyone except him. I'm not saying he's wrong, but it raises massive question marks in my head. We've lost the doc and the detective today. If MITO or Valley are leading us up the garden path we could take out 3 more of our own with no wins.
Even if you are a townie MITO you have to see that looks dodgy. We have to be suspicious of everyone named and also everyone who has come forward now. There is something very convenient yet also with a bit of evil genius in your explanation. It's possible, but your keenness that we take out everyone except you does set off a few alarm bells if I am honest.
We need to lynch the person that will tell us the most.
Lynch me & when innocent mito will say "oh i told you it was a 2/3 chance", so no idea if mito is lying.
Lynch tobes and we'll see if Valley is lying or not. I doubt he's lying as he was under no pressure to give out that info. Unless mafia can influence him somehow...
Lynch mito and we'll know if he's lying. He was under huge pressure so could be scrambling. I still want to know how he claims to have investigated 2 people. Also wary how he is covering himself for when i'm proven a vanilla townie. But i am wary in case he is telling the truth somehow...

no lets investigate him...
If nobody contradicts your role you have a duty to clean kill tobes.
I do think Gerrez would be a good one to investigate tomorrow. I'm not sure I'm following the line of argument with Valley at the min. However, its not a big enough niggle to think we should kill Gerrez.
We need to focus on the ones who have been named. The problem is we can't trust any of them. I know I'm going around in circles and contradicting myself but my mind is ****ed. I have thought of a plan though.
We put Valley, Tobes, MITO and Tennisball in a 4 way split. Anyone spoiling the split would be exposed (especially if a single townie was killed). If it goes wrong we only lose one more. We can't afford to risk losing both remaining detectives. However, we also can't afford to blindly believe them when there stories (especially MITO's) need further investigation. If we lose one detective on a coin toss it is a setback but not a disaster. If we lose them both it is a disaster. If we lose more townies without taking at least one mafia with them its a disaster with our detectives exposed to recruitment. They only have one kill left so can't take out both detectives.
So I say leave these four to the coin toss and then based on the innocent/guilty result we will have some real hard evidence for the following night, but we will only have lost one max (and maybe none).
The killers should go after the quiet ones. its the safest and most sensible option. For a start they are not helping, even if they are townies. There is a real chance the cartel is a silent player. Silent players can wake up and that would be devastating if we had killed off 2 or 3 of our own and left the cartel.
What do you all think?
Out of 20 people you get the detective and the doctor first night
And you all tell afc he's bad
if he'd been town this would have turned out much betterI'd go with that!I do think Gerrez would be a good one to investigate tomorrow. I'm not sure I'm following the line of argument with Valley at the min. However, its not a big enough niggle to think we should kill Gerrez.
We need to focus on the ones who have been named. The problem is we can't trust any of them. I know I'm going around in circles and contradicting myself but my mind is ****ed. I have thought of a plan though.
We put Valley, Tobes, MITO and Tennisball in a 4 way split. Anyone spoiling the split would be exposed (especially if a single townie was killed). If it goes wrong we only lose one more. We can't afford to risk losing both remaining detectives. However, we also can't afford to blindly believe them when there stories (especially MITO's) need further investigation. If we lose one detective on a coin toss it is a setback but not a disaster. If we lose them both it is a disaster. If we lose more townies without taking at least one mafia with them its a disaster with our detectives exposed to recruitment. They only have one kill left so can't take out both detectives.
So I say leave these four to the coin toss and then based on the innocent/guilty result we will have some real hard evidence for the following night, but we will only have lost one max (and maybe none).
The killers should go after the quiet ones. its the safest and most sensible option. For a start they are not helping, even if they are townies. There is a real chance the cartel is a silent player. Silent players can wake up and that would be devastating if we had killed off 2 or 3 of our own and left the cartel.
What do you all think?

Mito also questions how Valley had done two investigations before claiming two investigations himself![]()
Great work townOut of 20 people you get the detective and the doctor first night
And you all tell afc he's bad
if he'd been town this would have turned out much better
[HASHTAG]#worsttownever[/HASHTAG]

Great work townOut of 20 people you get the detective and the doctor first night
And you all tell afc he's bad
if he'd been town this would have turned out much better
[HASHTAG]#worsttownever[/HASHTAG]
Put our only 2 people with power (who's identities haven't been disputed yet) in a 50/50 coin toss? Sounds like a great idea.
I do think Gerrez would be a good one to investigate tomorrow. I'm not sure I'm following the line of argument with Valley at the min. However, its not a big enough niggle to think we should kill Gerrez.
We need to focus on the ones who have been named. The problem is we can't trust any of them. I know I'm going around in circles and contradicting myself but my mind is ****ed. I have thought of a plan though.
We put Valley, Tobes, MITO and Tennisball in a 4 way split. Anyone spoiling the split would be exposed (especially if a single townie was killed). If it goes wrong we only lose one more. We can't afford to risk losing both remaining detectives. However, we also can't afford to blindly believe them when there stories (especially MITO's) need further investigation. If we lose one detective on a coin toss it is a setback but not a disaster. If we lose them both it is a disaster. If we lose more townies without taking at least one mafia with them its a disaster with our detectives exposed to recruitment. They only have one kill left so can't take out both detectives.
So I say leave these four to the coin toss and then based on the innocent/guilty result we will have some real hard evidence for the following night, but we will only have lost one max (and maybe none).
The killers should go after the quiet ones. its the safest and most sensible option. For a start they are not helping, even if they are townies. There is a real chance the cartel is a silent player. Silent players can wake up and that would be devastating if we had killed off 2 or 3 of our own and left the cartel.
What do you all think?