Off Topic Adam Johnson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hung said:
stolen from the dark side as it had to be seen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MrRAWhite Well-Known Member

Start a Conversation
Joined:
Jan 25, 2011
Messages:
15,962
Likes Received:
442
New
marcusblackcat said: ↑

Have to say I popped onto the Newcastle and Hull boards last night and there was very little - the mags board are being pretty much like us in that "Wait and see what comes out in the wash" type thing and Hull had 3 posts on it! We hav 14 pages!!!
Must be looking in the wrong places then mate..Both boards have their own threads on Johnson with many posts, with the Mag board in particular having posts that have him guilty of being a child molester already..
PS..At time of posting the Hull board has 112 comments and the Skunks board 52 on this subject..

The two teams that I support are Sunderland and whoever are playing the Skunks!
:1980_boogie_down::emoticon-0157-sun:derland
[HASHTAG]#283[/HASHTAG]
MrRAWhite, Today at 12:20 PM
____________________________________________________________________________

what a fooking liar, most on here have not said he's guilty at all,
you're just another **** stirrer, and you wonder where the tabloids get it from <grr>
Click to expand...
You sir are an imbecilic idiot...Where in my post did I say that the majority on the Skunks board were saying one thing on another...What I did say is that the thread contained posts which had him down as guilty already, which is a totally correct statement...
I will await an apology with baited breath...
 
Defoe in a row said:
I would suggest a few posters on this thread either delete or edit some of their posts, just saying

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/durham-police-issue-social-media-8758918

Social media users who break the law 'will be dealt with robustly' :: People who post offensive tweets about Johnson himself may also be in Contempt of Court
Click to expand...

Certainly nobody has tweeted anything given this isn't twitter? I'm not seeing a great deal of law breaking going on so I think we're all just fine <ok> Which ones are offensive?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrRAWhite
Hung said:
stolen from the dark side as it had to be seen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MrRAWhite Well-Known Member

Start a Conversation
Joined:
Jan 25, 2011
Messages:
15,962
Likes Received:
442
New
marcusblackcat said: ↑

Have to say I popped onto the Newcastle and Hull boards last night and there was very little - the mags board are being pretty much like us in that "Wait and see what comes out in the wash" type thing and Hull had 3 posts on it! We hav 14 pages!!!
Must be looking in the wrong places then mate..Both boards have their own threads on Johnson with many posts, with the Mag board in particular having posts that have him guilty of being a child molester already..
PS..At time of posting the Hull board has 112 comments and the Skunks board 52 on this subject..

The two teams that I support are Sunderland and whoever are playing the Skunks!
:1980_boogie_down::emoticon-0157-sun:derland
[HASHTAG]#283[/HASHTAG]
MrRAWhite, Today at 12:20 PM
____________________________________________________________________________

what a fooking liar, most on here have not said he's guilty at all,
you're just another **** stirrer, and you wonder where the tabloids get it from <grr>
Click to expand...


Poor form from Whitey there, big time.
Very, very dissappointing.
 
MrRAWhite said:
You sir are an imbecilic idiot...Where in my post did I say that the majority on the Skunks board were saying one thing on another...What I did say is that the thread contained posts which had him down as guilty already, which is a totally correct statement...
I will await an apology with baited breath...
Click to expand...

could this be the bit you are looking for
it was already highlighted for you
"with the Mag board in particular having posts that have him guilty of being a child molester already.".

should of read what you wrote, the word 'in particular' means all of us
now you're saying the majority which it wasn't either
most on here are wait and see as Marcus had said, but you like to push the boat out a bit further
and you say I'm the idiot
 
I've seen some bad stuff in my Twitter feed to be fair.
Plus I've been emailed a few too.
In the age of the global village literally hundreds of thousands of twitterers would be in contempt of court.. All over the world in various jurisdictions.
It's impossible to police something like this.
I hope the police fast track this investigation as it's not fair on the lad if it is prolonged.
 
Defoe - Are you suggesting that Durham constabulary are about to prosecute thousands and thousands of people of have posted jokes, made comments about him, or reposted jokes made by others. I have to say I think is somewhat unlikely and completely unrealistic. I wouldn't pay much attention to RTG, its the village of the damned.

Again though, does this not further evidence why these cases need to be handled in a much more sensitive manner by the police, media etc. Once you put his name out there and tit bits of information into the public domain, you have immediately attached a stigma he'll struggle to shake off.
 
Hung said:
could this be the bit you are looking for
it was already highlighted for you
"with the Mag board in particular having posts that have him guilty of being a child molester already.".

should of read what you wrote, the word 'in particular' means all of us
now you're saying the majority which it wasn't either
most on here are wait and see as Marcus had said, but you like to push the boat out a bit further
and you say I'm the idiot
Click to expand...
I ask again...Where does it say anything about the majority of posts?..It mentions the thread having posts that have him guilty of being a child molester already... This is fact..What part of this to you not comprehend?
 
Trevor's Evil Sex Monkey said:
Defoe - Are you suggesting that Durham constabulary are about to prosecute thousands and thousands of people of have posted jokes, made comments about him, or reposted jokes made by others. I have to say I think is somewhat unlikely and completely unrealistic. I wouldn't pay much attention to RTG, its the village of the damned.

Again though, does this not further evidence why these cases need to be handled in a much more sensitive manner by the police, media etc. Once you put his name out there and tit bits of information into the public domain, you have immediately attached a stigma he'll struggle to shake off.
Click to expand...
You've re-tweeted on here, just trying to help
 
He'll get off the hook. He'll pay her some money to say she presented a fake ID and he had no way of knowing. That's that. He does kind of fit the image of a ****phile though....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back