It's brutal Meds. Not a choice I would want to have to make. Do you think my Bro who is deaf and dumb should have been aborted? He is life and soul now.
No but you should have been instead

It's brutal Meds. Not a choice I would want to have to make. Do you think my Bro who is deaf and dumb should have been aborted? He is life and soul now.

Thats fine but then if the woman decides to keep it then she should **** off with the alimony/child support demands
works both ways
Deaf and dumb is a little bit different from heart failure though isn't it
Deaf and dumb is a little bit different from heart failure though isn't it
As for the second part women will do whatever they like, doesnt make it right imo. As for the no one owns her I disagree when it comes to the issue of abortion, IMO the father has to have a say as the baby is owned by both.
That is a difficult one. Personally I would favour an option for a father to declare legally his unwillingness to have anything to do with a child before it is born thus handing all rights and responsibilities to the mother should she choose to keep it.
CiaranArdoynian:1779588 said:I am with most things. And it's not like I preach about abortion if I'm not asked. I was talking to a bloke the other day whose bird has had 4 abortions in the last 5 years, and I didn't say a word.
What to **** does that say below your name?
You think he has the right to use physical violence against her, then, as a sort of co-owner of her pregnant body? That's a very ****ed up concept.
Read it and weep Ciaran. Have you seen Gangs of New York, where there's a copper called Happy Jack Mulraney (played by the ugly ****er in Step Brothers and Talladega Nights)? Corrupt bloke who used to be one of the good guys in Priest Vallon's gang. That's gonna be me, but without the Irish accent![]()
That is not what I am saying and I think you know that. Also I did ask what if they both consent? but even that is not the point
The point is is it a life at less than 24 weeks?
By the way there is no concrete way of knowing the number of weeks anyway as they go by the womans last cycle
CiaranArdoynian:1779762 said:Read it and weep Ciaran. Have you seen Gangs of New York, where there's a copper called Happy Jack Mulraney (played by the ugly ****er in Step Brothers and Talladega Nights)? Corrupt bloke who used to be one of the good guys in Priest Vallon's gang. That's gonna be me, but without the Irish accent![]()
<UncleTom>
You keep out of trouble now biys <tapsbadgewithtruncheon>

In the real world, how would your suggestion be realized then?
I have no idea about the science of the matter and I won't pretend I do. I'm more concerned with the moral argument about a human being's innate control over their own body and how that affects the issue of aborting a parasitical baby.
I've got nothing against abortions, but I hate how the father has no say in the matter. It's his baby too.
For the people who think women should have control over her own body, does that mean she should be able to abort up until the moment of birth? If not, why not?

For the people who think women should have control over her own body, does that mean she should be able to abort up until the moment of birth? If not, why not?

CiaranArdoynian:1779876 said:You keep out of trouble now biys <tapsbadgewithtruncheon>
Scab![]()
