Ever thought of uniting behind them?
How is making positive suggestions opposing them?
Ever thought of uniting behind them?
How is making positive suggestions opposing them?
Re the branding thing. I do support the principle. There's clearly a market for stuff that actually has our name on it. However, with a large spoonful of realism, I really can't see how it would be possible to do. You'd have Allam's lawyers camped out on the doorstep before you could say "oh ****".
I filed a class 25 (clothing, footwear and headwear) trade mark application for Hull Tigers, to prevent anyone being able to use it on any form of clothing (including kits), I received a threat of legal action from Rollitts within days of them spotting it.
You can't beat the old plane flying over with an ALLAM OUT banner! Says it allI heard the FC one they flew over rovers was about a grand! But they were sweating on the weather because the plane had to fly from near Manchester and it was a bit rough going! They only got the yes about an hour before the kick off! Great organisation though even if I am a rovers fan
![]()
I expected you to expect me to pop up with something like that. I further expected that type of response.
Nobody is asking anyone to lay out a business plan. Just not to talk in riddles. If you've got something to suggest, suggest it. If you haven't, then don't clog up the thread with vague nonsense.
Re the branding thing. I do support the principle. There's clearly a market for stuff that actually has our name on it. However, with a large spoonful of realism, I really can't see how it would be possible to do. You'd have Allam's lawyers camped out on the doorstep before you could say "oh ****".
I do also think that efforts at the moment should be focussed almost exclusively on direct action and campaigning to get the Allams out of our club. This, for me, would take up time and resource better served elsewhere. First and foremost, we need them out.
Rollits are literally the Devil's advocate. Every day their job at work is to make sure the Allams get away with some sort of skullduggery. What a squalid career that must be.
OLM. Are you saying a brand using the name 'Hull City' (without the AFC) could be a goer?
If a suggestion for action is to have the best chance of full and frank discussion,it should probably be clearly stated and not mixed up with other things. A suggestion interlaced with apparent criticism of certain individuals and supporters groups tends to suggest an agenda more than a positive suggestion. Protagonists really should have learnt by now.
I think an alternative Hull City type clothing brand is unlikely to hasten the Allams out of Hull City, which is what will unite fans above all else. But I'm looking forward to being proved spectacularly wrong by focussed and inclusive actions.
What kind of unity is dissing everything the Trust try to do? What's positive about that.There's nothing vague or fuzzy in what I put. It's certainly clearer than what's come from you or the trust.
I'm suggesting that looking for opportunities to improve the match day experience would have benefits to the campaign.
I've suggested that one option is to market clothing. It doesn't have to conflict with any copyright anymore than 'irrelevant' or ask Ehab does.
I've suggested that the empty seats could be an opportunity to get like minded people together, be they the sort that like to sit or those that lie to stand.
None of that needs any input from the Allams, so fans can help fans.
What's not to like?
Why some have to chuck obstruction and negativity, rather than looking at ways to progress things is probably saying something about them.
Unity need not be feared.
Where's the
What kind of unity is dissing everything the Trust try to do? What's positive about that.
You've got your positive and negative the wrong way around Dutch.
Sigh. What's the point in discussion, when all you do is deny what you quite clearly do?I don't diss everything they do. I do think that there are other ways of doing things, and encouraging, rather than obstructing discussion is one.
What's the problem with offering suggestions?
Isn't a lack of discussion part of what is wrong with the Allams?
Sigh. What's the point in discussion, when all you do is deny what you quite clearly do?
They're only carrying out instructions.