A little bit of my QPR ART.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Excellent stuff GR. That's a fine talent you have there. You would've got on well with Brixton he was a keen artist, as is Rebel not taken.
 
Who are they meant to be? Lee Cook, Martin Rowlands, Matthew Connolly, Mikele Leigertwood and Danny Glover?

Only joking, you did a very good job :D
 
Well done to you, GR.
It is so obvious that we QPR fans are extremely talented, well.............. some of us .............. ok, some of you!:redface:
Hope it brings you much pleasure and a bit of coin wouldn't hurt either.
 
Great work Gloucester... you have undoubted eye for light and shade... An artist among us
 
GloucesterRanger said:
You must log in or register to see images

Being arty farty I decided to actually combine 2 of my loves in life and draw this quite iconic photo of 5 of our stars from the past. Spent an absolute age doing it and I'm quite happy with how it turned out....although Gerry in the middle caused me headaches. Usually I'm doing requests to draw peoples kids or family so it made a nice change. Generally I only post my art on my Facebook page but half the people there wouldn't know who the 5 in the drawing are so thought I'd post it here also. Comments always welcome.
Click to expand...

Absolute quality Gloucester…but you wouldn't want to meet Phil Parkes in a dark alley anytime soon!
 
Many an artist works from photographs these days... for interpretation, inspiration or as a challenge of their abilities. Nothing unusual or wrong with that if the owner/viewer enjoys the talent in creating it.
 
QPRNY said:
My attempt

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

Was that done from scratch using just a pencil, eraser and paper? Or was it a few clicks on a computer? See THAT'S a difference in art. Comes in many forms, some easier than others. Even your little mock up is classed as digital art. It's the effort and ability in creating or recreating that people appreciate mostly, not the ability to buy a program to do it for you. Good effort though.
 
I did forward your work to Ian taylor our PR man but seems a) maybe does not promote fans work
or

B) as he was a spurs fan at the time apparently he dont know the five superstars drawn
 
QPRNY said:
I might piss a few people off but when is "Art" copying a photograph?
Click to expand...

Art is a creation of talent and skill.
To mirror a photograph or alike takes great skill.
We may think it is easy but within a few short seconds of attempting such a feat, you can tell who has the skill and who hasn't.
Even if you were to trace it, takes great skill to get it perfect ......... whereas, the other 99% of us would just do an average job.

Make no mistake ............ the gentleman has skill by the bucket loads.
 
I think Rembrandt was an artist, I think Monet was an artist, I think many other people are artists. You have a skill to copy, you are not an "Artist"
 
QPRNY said:
I think Rembrandt was an artist, I think Monet was an artist, I think many other people are artists. You have a skill to copy, you are not an "Artist"
Click to expand...

So I assume you don't see Van Goughs 'Sunflowers' as art, because following your argument, it was just a 'copy' ??

Or does it have to be a copy of a photo that doesn't fit your definition of 'Art' ??
If that's the case then you are quite frankly talking bollox.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back