Or maybe not...
Teed - Take no notice of the OP he's a ****ing idiot.
ParkmaverickStriker - That's an insult to ****ing idiots.
Haha fair dos...
Transfer Rumours 2016/17 City Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Haha fair dos...
pudseytiger
Well-Known Member
And you just know he's going to end up here.
Even if the Lascelles thing was true, they'd have us paying through the nose.
Hull City are said to be interested in Norwich City's impressive centre back Ryan Bennett. The former Grimsby Town player is also being pursued by fellow Premier promotion outfit Middlesbrough and Scottish champions Celtic.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...tory-29384824-detail/story.html#ixzz4BBCEY6Ap
Probably bollocks.
You must log in or register to see images
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...tory-29384824-detail/story.html#ixzz4BBCEY6Ap
Probably bollocks.
Nick Powell has been released, I wouldn't mind him on a free.
Me also, saw enough in his fleeting appearances to see he has quality.
Depends what we get him on but I'm guessing he's pretty desperate and wont get another Premier League offer other than us. if we can get him for 2 years on - say 18k a week - then that's defo worth a punt. Any longer and it's too much of a risk.
I certainly think he is a bit injury prone, so a initial contract for 2 years with an extension would be the way to go.
I'd go for one year which triggers a second year if he plays 25+ games. He seems to be made of balsa wood. I couldn't even bring myself to risk two years unless he'd played enough times in year one.
I'd definitely have a look at Fletcher. Is he a bit injury prone though?
Powell, not for me ta.
Powell, not for me ta.
Fletcher is nowhere near good enough anymore, but I'd take Powell though.
If he was good enough once he can be again.
He's 29 and on a free, stupid not to have a look at him unless he's a sick note.
Fletcher is only 29. On a free he is a good squad player, remember we will need probably 3 new strikers.
Fletcher? Fletcher sucks. He isnt even close to being good enough anymore. His age has nothing to do with it, he just isnt good enough.