£17m price tag slapped onto Carroll...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
king out of much respect to you I'll answer that.

I sort of agree. Rodgers will have to play a waiting game. If he really wants say christian eriksson and alonso he's got to shift carroll to get some wages but we know both selling clubs will hold out for the best deal. they always do. Then add to that the cost and the money form carroll is needed.

If we look at LFC we see 3 strikers so its not like the guy is needed to make no 4. no its again will someone actually bid for suarez. If they do and its a fight to keep / get the best price then the fact is rodgers might need to hang on unitl he gets his own replacement in.

I expect preseason is actually early for a sale i think that unless LFC are learning nothing OR someone does pony up 17mil (mad) then carroll will only go late on in the window after the season has begun. (last two weeks)

I would agree that the fee is not going to grow from 17mil and carrol's not done much to help it at west ham. West ham cannot afford 17mil thats clear and he doesn't want to stay there anyway.... 12mil plus add ons to bring it close to 17 if say he plays for england or does this or that is indeed likely.

Much depends on suarez and our actual targets this summer. we'll need the money so carroll is one obvious source of it.
 
Tash. said:
Fine, I suppose we'll be forced to part with Williamson.

Bastards.
Click to expand...

you'll be parting with a lot more if you don't win a few! Fulham home, if you lose that gimmie as well... oh boy! I would actually hate to see it but you are up to your neck..
 
KingEric07 said:
To be fair I could put a 17m price tag on my dump but I still wouldn't get it.

I think you will sell him in preseason for around £12m plus add ons <ok>
Click to expand...

Dumps? Add-on? There is a thread for this **** <ok>
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
king out of much respect to you I'll answer that.

I sort of agree. Rodgers will have to play a waiting game. If he really wants say christian eriksson and alonso he's got to shift carroll to get some wages but we know both selling clubs will hold out for the best deal. they always do. Then add to that the cost and the money form carroll is needed.

If we look at LFC we see 3 strikers so its not like the guy is needed to make no 4. no its again will someone actually bid for suarez. If they do and its a fight to keep / get the best price then the fact is rodgers might need to hang on unitl he gets his own replacement in.

I expect preseason is actually early for a sale i think that unless LFC are learning nothing OR someone does pony up 17mil (mad) then carroll will only go late on in the window after the season has begun. (last two weeks)

I would agree that the fee is not going to grow from 17mil and carrol's not done much to help it at west ham. West ham cannot afford 17mil thats clear and he doesn't want to stay there anyway.... 12mil plus add ons to bring it close to 17 if say he plays for england or does this or that is indeed likely.

Much depends on suarez and our actual targets this summer. we'll need the money so carroll is one obvious source of it.
Click to expand...

Unless we desperately need the money then the best option would be to continue loaning him out so long as the wages are being paid for. Carroll has about four years left to run on his Liverpool contract and will get better so the price can only grow. We won't get anywhere the ridiculous £35m but if we want £17m then we should stick to our guns as long as its not to the detriment of Liverpool Football Club!
 
rickd said:
I'm new to these boards so don't know if the lad who posted this is just on a wind up or not. However I do agree with his point...

I think we would be better off selling Carroll for £10m and then using that money to invest in the squad. That's better than having him on the bench or loaned out again. We have to view the £35m as a already paid cost and just view any money we get for him as a positive.
Click to expand...

Welcome to the forum. Tash is an out-and-out wum. However, I don't think we'll get 17 mill for Carroll. Why not visit the 'Welcome Thread'. It's specifically posted for new members like yourself. Enjoy <ok>
 
Gerrez said:
Unless we desperately need the money then the best option would be to continue loaning him out so long as the wages are being paid for. Carroll has about four years left to run on his Liverpool contract and will get better so the price can only grow. We won't get anywhere the ridiculous £35m but if we want £17m then we should stick to our guns as long as its not to the detriment of Liverpool Football Club!
Click to expand...

You sad ****. You're even putting links in to your ****ing horrible thread now. How low can you go? <doh>
 
Liverpool can put whatever price they want on his head, it means nothing until another club decides to pay it.

The game around Carroll's future has already started, WHU won't pay that sort of dosh for him, Rodgers has now said that he can come back "as a squad player" & now the 'leaked' valuation. They're basically saying publicly to his agent & the player himself, go & find a club prepared to pay roughly what we will accept or you'll be coming back here to sit in the stiffs.
 
Big Bird said:
Liverpool can put whatever price they want on his head, it means nothing until another club decides to pay it.

The game around Carroll's future has already started, WHU won't pay that sort of dosh for him, Rodgers has now said that he can come back "as a squad player" & now the 'leaked' valuation. They're basically saying publicly to his agent & the player himself, go & find a club prepared to pay roughly what we will accept or you'll be coming back here to sit in the stiffs.
Click to expand...

And whats wrong with that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back