The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
DMD said:
It does matter, because you were once again trying, and failing to be a smart arse. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

The discussion you're referring to was on border control, you're now trying to conflate that with a different policy on immigration.

If you stop trying to be a smart arse, and actually had an opinion on something yourself, perhaps you'll be taken more seriously. :emoticon-0105-wink:

As you'll no doubt just burble on saying **** all, her views there seem in line with those of the Scots regarding the English in higher education. Do you have an issue with it happening in a part of the UK?
Click to expand...

Dont confuse him
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
DMD said:
It does matter, because you were once again trying, and failing to be a smart arse. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

The discussion you're referring to was on border control, you're now trying to conflate that with a different policy on immigration.

If you stop trying to be a smart arse, and actually had an opinion on something yourself, perhaps you'll be taken more seriously. :emoticon-0105-wink:

As you'll no doubt just burble on saying **** all, her views there seem in line with those of the Scots regarding the English in higher education. Do you have an issue with it happening in a part of the UK?
Click to expand...
And he's off <laugh>

What the actual **** has Scotland and higher education got to do with the fascist saying that foreigners should pay for schooling in France?
 
DMD said:
It does matter, because you were once again trying, and failing to be a smart arse. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

The discussion you're referring to was on border control, you're now trying to conflate that with a different policy on immigration.

If you stop trying to be a smart arse, and actually had an opinion on something yourself, perhaps you'll be taken more seriously. :emoticon-0105-wink:

As you'll no doubt just burble on saying **** all, her views there seem in line with those of the Scots regarding the English in higher education. Do you have an issue with it happening in a part of the UK?
Click to expand...

It's not in line at all. It would be if English kids living in Scotland were charged to go to school. Tertiary education isn't a universal right. Foreigners pay more for some tertiary education in England than English kids do too.

Border control is part of immigration, so no conflation here. She's proposing denying free access to what should be a basic right. If that's her view of foreigners' kids, what other otherwise free services would be a fee for only foreigners?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
DMD said:
What I put in the first reply stumpy. <doh>

The student fees for higher education in Scotland vary depending on your nationality.
Click to expand...
Higher education fees you dickhead.

She was referring to SCHOOLING <doh>
 
Watford_R said:
It's not in line at all. It would be if English kids living in Scotland were charged to go to school. Tertiary education isn't a universal right. Foreigners pay more for some tertiary education in England than English kids do too.

Border control is part of immigration, so no conflation here. She's proposing denying free access to what should be a basic right. If that's her view of foreigners' kids, what other otherwise free services would be a fee for only foreigners?
Click to expand...

Nothing is free, someone pays for it, often the tax payer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Watford_R said:
It's not in line at all. It would be if English kids living in Scotland were charged to go to school. Tertiary education isn't a universal right. Foreigners pay more for some tertiary education in England than English kids do too.

Border control is part of immigration, so no conflation here. She's proposing denying free access to what should be a basic right. If that's her view of foreigners' kids, what other otherwise free services would be a fee for only foreigners?
Click to expand...

Okay, as you're determined to conflate them.

If they move to France, and they have an option to become French citizens, they're no longer 'foreign' and get the education.

If they don't want to be French, why should the French fund them?
 
DMD said:
Okay, as you're determined to conflate them.

If they move to France, and they have an option to become French citizens, they're no longer 'foreign' and get the education.

If they don't want to be French, why should the French fund them?
Click to expand...

Because its the liberal left thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
DMD said:
Okay, as you're determined to conflate them.

If they move to France, and they have an option to become French citizens, they're no longer 'foreign' and get the education.

If they don't want to be French, why should the French fund them?
Click to expand...
It takes 5 years of living in France to gain French citizenship soft arse
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back