As low as that!! PLT's obviously voted a bit...
And his pal EPT sports or whatever his name is.
As low as that!! PLT's obviously voted a bit...
Hate to be right as its hurting us but we said it at the time. No to Marshall. No to Keane. No to Weir.We could have had £18m to spend on strikers instead of Mason and Marshall.
Hate to be right as its hurting us but we said it at the time. No to Marshall. No to Keane. No to Weir.
Had no idea about Mason, he was like the invisible man at Spurs been there years but hardly played.
I think he is a decent player but we really didnt need a CM player especially not for 13 million when we had no strike force.
Hate to be right as its hurting us but we said it at the time. No to Marshall. No to Keane. No to Weir.
Had no idea about Mason, he was like the invisible man at Spurs been there years but hardly played.
I think he is a decent player but we really didnt need a CM player especially not for 13 million when we had no strike force.
He needs his own chant.
No.Weren't you the one campaigning for Marshall to start because "he cost more than Jak so he should be starting"?
I'd read kemptons post on the thread...You're right. You made a thread saying we should be playing "the better" Marshall.
http://www.not606.com/threads/no-place-for-sentiment.335907/
I seem to recall some saying he should start because we didn't buy him to sit on the bench though, and thought you were one.
I'd read kemptons post on the thread...
What more do I have to do?You must log in or register to see images
"**** off, pal, it's this big."What more do I have to do?
What post? Which thread?I'd read kemptons post on the thread...

For Chazz to know and Kempo to wonder?What post? Which thread?![]()
Grrr, hate that.For Chazz to know and Kempo to wonder?