The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
He's probably got you on ignore like Stan and me mate.
The guy has to be one of the most despicable people I have ever come across in 20 years of populating internet forums, so I wouldn't lose much sleep over it <ok>
For all I know he has me on ignore too.
I tend not to put anyone on ignore, my ignore button is my eyes, in that if I want to ignore someone, I just dont read their ****.
 
The guy has to be one of the most despicable people I have ever come across in 20 years of populating internet forums, so I wouldn't lose much sleep over it <ok>
For all I know he has me on ignore too.
I tend not to put anyone on ignore, my ignore button is my eyes, in that if I want to ignore someone, I just dont read their ****.

I find him amusing in a weird kind of way tbh. He's severely delusional and his view on most subjects appears incredibly simplistic and more than a tad one eyed. Yet he thinks he's on some higher plane in terms of both intelligence and knowledge to the rest of this forum (and plenty of others I might add).
 
I find him amusing in a weird kind of way tbh. He's severely delusional and his view on most subjects appears incredibly simplistic and more than a tad one eyed. Yet he thinks he's on some higher plane in terms of both intelligence and knowledge to the rest of this forum (and plenty of others I might add).
I feel much the same but I need to heed the advice of Bodanki.
 
I find him amusing in a weird kind of way tbh. He's severely delusional and his view on most subjects appears incredibly simplistic and more than a tad one eyed. Yet he thinks he's on some higher plane in terms of both intelligence and knowledge to the rest of this forum (and plenty of others I might add).
I feel much the same but I need to heed the advice of Bodanki.
Trying to tell him anything is like trying to teach a goat how to play the guitar.
It might seem like it will be amusing at first, but once the humour wears off it quickly becomes apparent that he does not carry the prerequisites to learn such information.
 
It's quite funny to see being a bullshitter linked to voting remain.
Leaving aside the entire Leave campaign being a complete lie from start to finish, Boris Johnson got sacked for lying. Twice.
The flurry of backstabbing and betrayal that followed the referendum didn't involved any lying, either. Honest.

Keith Vaz is a dick and I'll be glad to see the back of him, frankly.
I don't actually care about people taking drugs or using the services of prostitutes, but he's a hypocrite and an idiot.
Putting himself in a situation that could so easily lead to blackmail is utterly moronic and dangerous.
 
I tend to agree with Bod on this one. At the start it's good fun kicking his nonsense into touch and generally taking the piss.

But after a while it gets tiresome. He just keeps repeating the same nonsense and telling people that they're not sensible, or they're illogical if they can't recognise his penetrating insights.

If you're a 'remainer' you're not sensible, in his little narrow, bigoted world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki
It's quite funny to see being a bullshitter linked to voting remain.
Leaving aside the entire Leave campaign being a complete lie from start to finish, Boris Johnson got sacked for lying. Twice.
The flurry of backstabbing and betrayal that followed the referendum didn't involved any lying, either. Honest.

Keith Vaz is a dick and I'll be glad to see the back of him, frankly.
I don't actually care about people taking drugs or using the services of prostitutes, but he's a hypocrite and an idiot.
Putting himself in a situation that could so easily lead to blackmail is utterly moronic and dangerous.

Pompous, self important twat! I really can't stand him!

Not very nice what was done to him, but if it gets rid of the smug ****!...
 
Pompous, self important twat! I really can't stand him!

Not very nice what was done to him, but if it gets rid of the smug ****!...
I can't even agree that the papers stitching him up wasn't nice.
He's supposed to be examining the effects of drugs and prostitution on society for his role on the Commons Select Committee.
This might be taking that commitment a little bit too far.
 
I can't even agree that the papers stitching him up wasn't nice.
He's supposed to be examining the effects of drugs and prostitution on society for his role on the Commons Select Committee.
This might be taking that commitment a little bit too far.

An 'in depth' study, perhaps? <laugh>
 
I tend to agree with Bod on this one. At the start it's good fun kicking his nonsense into touch and generally taking the piss.

But after a while it gets tiresome. He just keeps repeating the same nonsense and telling people that they're not sensible, or they're illogical if they can't recognise his penetrating insights.

If you're a 'remainer' you're not sensible, in his little narrow, bigoted world.

The funny thing is I voted Leave, same as him, and I still think he is a world class Toss pot.
Not gonna go over my reasons for voting Leave again, but it had nothing to do with immigration problems, since I don't think this country has one.
He is bigoted, short sighted, and his views are just outdated, backward rhetoric, like the bullshit my grandad used to spew.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NSIS
... did you forget a comma after "what" ? or possibly "saying" ?... without one the sentence doesn't work ... I've answered your second sentence.
You should have been able to understand the question without a comma anywhere. So far you haven't answered my second sentence.

... as to the first ... what possible motive would you have for metioning Keith Vaz and that he is a remainer? ... has he been in the news or something? ... for something that has sod all to do with the EU debate perhaps? or is he just the first of a long list of brexiters that you were, in any case, going to name and it's just pure coincidence that he is currently in the papers <doh>
So you still don't seem to be able to answer my second sentence.
Let's go for a list of what he did and see what is most likely a reason for me to mention he's from the Remain said:
1. He has sex with young men despite being married
2. He has been accused of paying young men for sex using funds from a charity
3. He criticises others, the newspapers, rather than himself
I've omitted commas, the word "and" as well as a full stop.
The reason I mention him as being from the Remain side is because of number 3. The Remain side seem to blame the Leave side because they say they are "racists and bigots" rather than admitting the problem is because they supported the EU, which is a failed organisation. There, I used a comma just so you would feel better.
 
The funny thing is I voted Leave, same as him, and I still think he is a world class Toss pot.
Not gonna go over my reasons for voting Leave again, but it had nothing to do with immigration problems, since I don't think this country has one.
He is bigoted, short sighted, and his views are just outdated, backward rhetoric, like the bullshit my grandad used to spew.

I've no issue with those who voted leave after thinking all facets through. I disagree with you, but respect your decision.

It's the assortment of bigots, racists, little Englanders that piss me off. Those who think that it will stop any more darkies or muzzies moving into their street. **** the economic consequences as long as there no more immigrants.

The there's the ones I sort of feel sorry for. The idiots and lazy twats who just either believed that there really would be an extra £350mill per for the health service ( yep, they do exist! ) or like these cretins up in Sunderland that were interviewed a week or two ago. They hadn't got a clue what they were voting for but thought it had to be better than what they had now. Only to find that, er,..nothing's changed. Except, of course, that whatever EU funding was going up there will stop.

And, yeah, my grandad was exactly the same!...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki
You should have been able to understand the question without a comma anywhere. So far you haven't answered my second sentence.


So you still don't seem to be able to answer my second sentence.
Let's go for a list of what he did and see what is most likely a reason for me to mention he's from the Remain said:
1. He has sex with young men despite being married
2. He has been accused of paying young men for sex using funds from a charity
3. He criticises others, the newspapers, rather than himself
I've omitted commas, the word "and" as well as a full stop.
The reason I mention him as being from the Remain side is because of number 3. The Remain side seem to blame the Leave side because they say they are "racists and bigots" rather than admitting the problem is because they supported the EU, which is a failed organisation. There, I used a comma just so you would feel better.

Most agree that the bloke is a smug twat and deserves his comeuppance.

However, you're attempt to link his being a remain supporter to his indiscretions is, as Tobes has said, barking mad!...
 
I've no issue with those who voted leave after thinking all facets through. I disagree with you, but respect your decision.

It's the assortment of bigots, racists, little Englanders that piss me off. Those who think that it will stop any more darkies or muzzies moving into their street. **** the economic consequences as long as there no more immigrants.

The there's the ones I sort of feel sorry for. The idiots and lazy twats who just either believed that there really would be an extra £350mill per for the health service ( yep, they do exist! ) or like these cretins up in Sunderland that were interviewed a week or two ago. They hadn't got a clue what they were voting for but thought it had to be better than what they had now. Only to find that, er,..nothing's changed. Except, of course, that whatever EU funding was going up there will stop.

And, yeah, my grandad was exactly the same!...
I know you don't like people stating the obvious. The best thing to do is to stop spouting nonsense. I've told you many times: The UK has not yet left the EU.
Why should things change before the UK leaves the EU?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.