The EU debate - Part II

Remain people wanted to stay in a corrupt undemocratic failed organisation. When sensible people voted to leave the corrupt undemocratic failed organisation the Remain people say that it's not their fault. It's the fault of the people who voted Leave. Vaz says: "It's not my fault. It's the people who exposed my behaviour."

 

Correlating this blokes view on the EU debate with some character trait that you've universally assigned to the 48% of the voting populous shows you're batshit mental

 

Fair play Merv.
I do think that he is ignoring the point that Cameron and Osborne duped the BOE by claiming they would trigger brexit immediately and therefore the banks forecasts were based on article 50 having been triggered.

 

The Remain people are totally discredited. They just insult anybody who disagree with them. They expect the UK government to publicise their plans prior to negotiations.
Anybody who explains why they are wrong they accuse of stating the obvious! That is the funniest part.

 

I can't believe he's actually now trying to justify that ridiculous correlation

For the record you silly old fool, Remain voters do blame those who took the converse view for the fact that (in our opinion) we now stand on the brink of potential economic suicide. Isn't that how it ****ing works like?

I blamed Tory voters for the Thatcher era, as they were responsible for electing the witch.

 

Wake up,
Just like those who voted leave had different reasons, so did those who voted remain. The idea that all people who voted remain thought the EU was ideal is as dumb as claiming all brexiteers are racist

 

They're left huddling together in the backwaters of minority sites like this, so they can continue to delude themselves they know best.

 

You're a ****ing loon Pete. No wonder your missus is feeding you up to the size of Jabba the Hut!

 

Cameron and Osborne thought that their campaign of fear would result in a remain vote winning. Cameron was so shocked by losing he did the honourable thing and resigned. It's only dishonourable people who still go on about how unfair it all is. You lost the vote. The UK is leaving the EU. Nobody cares about your opinions. Your ideas are totally wrong. The banks are fools if they base forecasts on article 50 being triggered immediately. Why should the UK government do that? It is much more sensible to do it when you are ready. I suppose that is too obvious for some people though.

 

Not sure anyone can claim they know best. We are still waiting to know what brexit will become.

 

The bloke that oversaw one of the worst economic crashes in history? Yeah, let's listen to him.
It's nice to see the Brexiters going with such an anti-establishment figure again, too.

 

Nice.
Nobody cares and yet you cared enough to respond.

I'm touched.

 

Precisely.There are a lot of twists to come.

 

If you admit the EU is a corrupt failed undemocratic organisation then you shouldn't want to be part of it. Even if you are scared of standing on your own two feet. You must prefer being told what to do by others. Let me guess: You are an employee?

 

Probably because Cameron said pre the vote that he'd do it the next morning, but don't let facts get in the way of your latest ignorant rant.

"Nobody cares about your opinion", "Your ideas are totally wrong"

Good job you never got round to writing that manifesto fat lad, as you'd have been a ****e politician

 

I don't care about your opinions. They are worthless. You have proved it many times. Wrong about the referendum. Wrong about a second referendum. Wrong about MPs not accepting leaving the EU.

 

I see, if you don't like the message, shoot the messenger.

 

Or you would want to be a part and reform it. My personal view is the EU and particularly the Euro is unsustainable in its current form

I've already discussed what I do for a living so no need to guess. Most of my job involves telling others what to do. How many staff do you have?

 

Do you have a macro-key that types the words "the EU is a corrupt failed undemocratic organisation"?
We have the House of Lords and a Queen, so I suppose that you want to leave England, too?

Not this ****, again. You don't understand what that means.
If you go to an authority on economics and he's demonstrated that he's untrustworthy, then his opinion isn't worth ****.
That's all that interview was: his opinion. If he'd offered some facts or made some demonstrable claims, then it might be different.

 

Here he goes again

Sir Peter Saxton head of the Saxton corporation

Employees - 1

Dogs - 2

Garages offices - 1

Kitchens - 2

Dead cats in an urn on the mantelpiece - 1