HCST Protest Plans

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I don't know. Why does that matter? My point is the club gave, at best, misleading information which will have coerced some people into joining earlier than they might otherwise.
It matters precisely because you're saying it's misleading to say they should join up to avoid the fee, when joining up meant they avoided the fee. <doh>

Edit: IF people didn't pay the fee that's an entirely different matter.
 
It's not for a season, it's for an ongoing monthly membership, so they're only paying more if they decide to stop going. The way they've done it is not very clever, but I doubt Trading Standards will be all that interested.
I've seen one response from the trading standards that asks the fan to get in touch with the Premier League.
 
The issue the club had last season, was that they claimed that prices would go up if you didn't sign up by a certain date, but they didn't go up after that date, so they were warned that they had misled customers and shouldn't do it again.

This time it's different, as the price did go up after the date specified and people benefited from being able to pick a better seat, or being able to sign up in the cheapest zone (which subsequently sold out), there's only really potentially a case if there were people signing up later without paying the higher price.

I actually know someone who got their memberships for £5 a month, as a result of the way the club worded it's family guarantee.

We're shocking at the legal aspects of these things.
 
The issue the club had last season, was that they claimed that prices would go up if you didn't sign up by a certain date, but they didn't go up after that date, so they were warned that they had misled customers and shouldn't do it again.

This time it's different, as the price did go up after the date specified and people benefited from being able to pick a better seat, or being able to sign up in the cheapest zone (which subsequently sold out), there's only really potentially a case if there were people signing up later without paying the higher price.

I actually know someone who got their memberships for £5 a month, as a result of the way the club worded it's family guarantee.

We're shocking at the legal aspects of these things.

How is that not surprising?

Why don't we enter the circus business? As a club, we'd do pretty well.
 
How is that not surprising?

Why don't we enter the circus business? As a club, we'd do pretty well.

The charging for membership was offered as an incentive for signing before a particular date, but in the event people didn't get charged after that date either, which is something that trading standards can look at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cortez91
I tend to agree with this. I can't bring myself to join the scheme. Not because it's giving the owners money, but because I feel so strongly it's wrong.

I'm still not sure if I can buy tickets on a match by match basis without signing up to owt. That's my current preferred option.
After all of my ranting I think actually this sums up how I feel.
 
I like the idea of throwing dummies on the pitch.

Problem is... half of us can't get involved as we won't be there!

A protest that everyone can get involved in should take place outside the Allams house - a mass meet at the Beech Tree, coordinate and then protest march?
 
Had confirmation the protests will publicised/discussed during Sky Sports' broadcast of our game against Leicester:

You must log in or register to see images


(Simon Thomas will be presenting our game).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bielbs and DMD
Two types of protests doing the rounds on social media:

The first is a walk out on the 19th minute.
Second is sitting in after the game and not moving.

Have either of these come from the Trust or are people making these up themselves?
Is it possibly the Trust put something out about the protests because if we end up having several smaller groups of people doing different protests, it's not going to be as effective.

I love the idea of sitting in afterwards by the way. Sky will be filming up to 2:45-3:00 and they are presenting on-site this season on Saturdays.
 
But as per the City website on the 13th June, the club were encouraging people to buy a membership asap as an £84 joining fee will apply after 23rd June. Therefore, for some it was not wholly about 'paying for the privilege of a better seat'.

The actual wording in the 'earn your stripes' booklet is 'a joining fee MAY apply'; the adding of the 'May' means it is then discretionary and the club can choose whether to charge it or not.
 
The actual wording in the 'earn your stripes' booklet is 'a joining fee MAY apply'; the adding of the 'May' means it is then discretionary and the club can choose whether to charge it or not.

That's the key. I was under the impression they'd said more than that. If all they've said is 'may' then there'll be no case to answer and it explains the response one fan on Twitter has received which says as much. If they have said that a joining fee 'will' apply then that's exactly what they did before and had their wrists slapped for.
 
The issue the club had last season, was that they claimed that prices would go up if you didn't sign up by a certain date, but they didn't go up after that date, so they were warned that they had misled customers and shouldn't do it again.

This time it's different, as the price did go up after the date specified and people benefited from being able to pick a better seat, or being able to sign up in the cheapest zone (which subsequently sold out), there's only really potentially a case if there were people signing up later without paying the higher price.

I actually know someone who got their memberships for £5 a month, as a result of the way the club worded it's family guarantee.

We're shocking at the legal aspects of these things.

How did they able to get the £5 pass? I spent a hell of a long time arguing with them that each of my group should pay individually what they paid last year as we all paid separately (me and 2 nephews) but they weren't having it and in the end my sister just gave in and paid it. This was after my sister initially being told her kid's pass would be the same as last year only to later find they'd hadn't actually renewed it and being told they shouldn't have told her that.
 
How did they able to get the £5 pass? I spent a hell of a long time arguing with them that each of my group should pay individually what they paid last year as we all paid separately (me and 2 nephews) but they weren't having it and in the end my sister just gave in and paid it. This was after my sister initially being told her kid's pass would be the same as last year only to later find they'd hadn't actually renewed it and being told they shouldn't have told her that.

They managed to prove that the kids they took weren't paid for by them, so the people buying their tickets got no benefit from the drop in adult prices and the only way they could pay no more than last season (as per the family guarantee) was if they continued to pay £60 each.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
They managed to prove that the kids they took weren't paid for by them, so the people buying their tickets got no benefit from the drop in adult prices and the only way they could pay no more than last season (as per the family guarantee) was if they continued to pay £60 each.

That's exactly what I'd been telling them but they wouldn't have it. I shall be going back to them now. Thanks.