Transfer Rumours 2016/17 City Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
SydneyTiger14 said:
Apparently Dyche is being given 60m to spend. If they have that much we really want to be forking out some cash if we want to stay up.

My worry is if the Allams stay in charge they'll be complacent and think if we go back down we can bounce straight back up again.
Click to expand...

Part of Bruceys stance will all be geared to ensuring the cheque is open and ready for business. I think its called posturing!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Kevin Francis said:
Depends on our ambitions. I would like a new no 1 better than McGregor. At the very least someone who's going to provide a realistic challenge for no1 spot
Click to expand...

Me too, but suspect thats 12 months away and dependant upoin which division we are in. Brucey seems to have decided on his keepers, and with 3 under contract can't seee us making a move in the immediate future unless he could move one on!
 
In fairness we haven't even seen Kuciak play. In five months he could be a decent challenger for McGregor.
 
In regards to the keeper situation I'm pretty sure we will stay as we are but in an ideal world I would have liked a new no1 and McGregor as back up/challenging for top spot. It's not a massively weak area, it's just that old Alan is prone to bouts of **** form
 
Kevin Francis said:
In regards to the keeper situation I'm pretty sure we will stay as we are but in an ideal world I would have liked a new no1 and McGregor as back up/challenging for top spot. It's not a massively weak area, it's just that old Alan is prone to bouts of **** form
Click to expand...

We won't have a bottomless purse for transfers; with keeper being the least of our problem positions cash will be spent elsewhere first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
With regards the potential budget it will I presume still have to fall within FFP, I`m not an expert in this, so wonder how it will restrict our budget, if anyone could enlighten me i`d be most grateful.
 
the tv cash is income!

It means you can't spend more than you earn, in simple terms. We earn the cash we can spend it. The tv money is all in the pot.

Irrespective of budget, we still have to convince players to come to Hull.
That's as big an issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back