Ex-Manager Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who would you have as our next Manager


  • Total voters
    213
I admire the Board for this. If Everton want to chuck money at it, for their sake it had better work out. I get frustrated by fans just wanting the Board to throw money at it (or assuming we haven't or won't). It was only 2009 that we went into administration.

Depends how much money and to what ends. Running at breakeven or slightly better? Good idea. Running in such a way as to try and turn a hefty profit for a couple years? Just as risky as spending too much.
 
Lots of people writing us off, here, too. Saints have continually stressed a new five-year plan. Players have signed and are in talks to sign five/six year deals. If we're about to enter the next phase and it has sustained investment and new goals, perhaps it's best to have someone who can see themselves here past 2020 rather than someone who won't commit beyond one more season in the hope that something better comes along for them. Especially if Katharina is willing to up the funding again.

(just thinking out loud, by the way - not been informed of anything fresh about Koeman's future)

Absolutely. I did say before all the Everton stuff came up that if Ron wasn't going to sign his extension, then I would understand if the Board moved him on and got someone else in. I wouldn't have wanted a season of flux.
 
Absolutely. I did say before all the Everton stuff came up that if Ron wasn't going to sign his extension, then I would understand if the Board moved him on and got someone else in. I wouldn't have wanted a season of flux.

I agree I'd hate for him to stroll through next season knowing he's pissing off at the end of it anyway
 
And yet everyone rushed to call Poch a weasel. Amusing.

It's money. Just money. Their new owner has a bigger ego than Kat, so wants to chuck loads of it about. Kat doesn't, and fair enough.

Onwards. COYR.

I agree and if true i don't see much difference in MP or RK.

Not being negative at all, they both left for thinking they were better suited and think their stance is fairly similar in that I won't leave = leave. I'm sure people will point out MP strung us along but I'm not sure it was that straight forward in that if he hhadn't signed a new deal we would have been looking harder, same as now.

I would be amazed if we hadn't already had provisional conversations with agents...
 
If Ron goes to Everton, I will say that I have misjudged the character of the man. I have vested a lot faith in him and thought that he might be refreshingly different, he might still reject the job, but it's pretty obvious that he has not ruled it out yet.
 
Completely understand the idea that it is better off get rid of him if he is willing to just breeze next season then bugger off. I think why this is a poor excuse from the board (should they say that) is that Koeman was willing to listen to extension talks but we clearly haven't given him what he wanted. This is the sticking point, it all comes down to what his demands were. Was he unrealistic and would his demands harm the club? Or perhaps are the board lacking ambition by not meeting a fair enough demanded transfer budget? Ultimately we will likely never know so it will be hard to criticise either Koeman or the board without a clear picture.
 
Probably because he wouldn't commit further than this season and he's off for a bumper payday.
Think the cause-and-effect he's suggesting is that he wouldn't commit further than this season because the board wouldn't stump up the budget. Which is probably true; it's just a matter of whether they weren't willing to commit money at all, which would be concerning, or weren't willing to commit the same 100m+ that Everton apparently are, which would be wholly rational.
Sorry, this idea just doesn't add up. If that was the case why did Les Reed suggest the club's talks with Koeman were at an advanced stage and we were at the stage of sorting out the details of his contract?
 
Sorry, this idea just doesn't add up. If that was the case why did Les Reed suggest the club's talks with Koeman were at an advanced stage and we were at the stage of sorting out the details of his contract?

Maybe they were. Maybe we were offering a fairly substantial transfer budget, and Koeman was interested. Until Everton offered an absolutely enormous transfer budget, that we perhaps were unwilling to match. And couldn't reasonably match, really.
 
Sorry, this idea just doesn't add up. If that was the case why did Les Reed suggest the club's talks with Koeman were at an advanced stage and we were at the stage of sorting out the details of his contract?

Maybe Everton came in at the 11th hour and offered him much more then we can? Seems to be the most realistic idea so far given what Reed said.
 
Sammy Lee and Dave Watson wouldn't go to Everton, in any case, I'm sure.

They're Reed's troops on the ground. FA connections and were brought in to add to what Koeman could bring: Erwin and Jan.

I would imagine they'll stay if Ronald goes, especially Sammy with his Reds connections.
 
Maybe they were. Maybe we were offering a fairly substantial transfer budget, and Koeman was interested. Until Everton offered an absolutely enormous transfer budget, that we perhaps were unwilling to match. And couldn't reasonably match, really.
Maybe Everton came in at the 11th hour and offered him much more then we can? Seems to be the most realistic idea so far given what Reed said.
Yeah. So it's not the case that he isn't prepared to extend his contract and the board have decided to let him go. Koeman wants to leave the club now.