Who you calling soft you geriatric old fartI was 19, you soft ****![]()
This is you after 2 pints of shandy.
, sorry carling

Who you calling soft you geriatric old fartI was 19, you soft ****![]()

I was 19, you soft ****![]()
The drug he's alleged to have taken is a diuretic. If he was a weightlifter or a track athlete the fingers would be pointing that it was being used as a masking agent - which is what it is used for - to hide the use of anabolic steroids.
Did he look like a bloke with a few pounds to lose last month like?Or losing weight...their original abused use. Unless he's hiding a heart or kidney issue rather than a beer gut lol...
The drug he's alleged to have taken is a diuretic. If he was a weightlifter or a track athlete the fingers would be pointing that it was being used as a masking agent - which is what it is used for - to hide the use of anabolic steroids.
No...but then that would suggest the fat burning drugs worked eh?Did he look like a bloke with a few pounds to lose last month like?
I think football is in denial about PED's and the testing is beyond lax.
UEFA did some testing a couple of years back and found that nearly 8% of the samples showed high levels of testosterone - a giveaway sign of anabolic steroid use.No way is he on anobolic steroids or he'd be built like a combo of Arnie and Sly and have to turn his entire upper body to look sideways.
I was making a wider point mate, but no, they're far from old newsNo...but then that would suggest the fat burning drugs worked eh?
It is on record that the reason Rodgers wouldn't play him was weight and fitness issues coming in from the summer.
Aren't anabolic steroids a bit 1980's? Loads more non steroidal performance enhancing drugs that are harder to detect out now. WADA have admitted a lot of them are almost impossible to detect with current testing...why would he take a steroid easy to detect and then a banned diuretic also easy to detect to try and mask the steroid when you'll still get banned for taking either?
Although in a case like this it would be interesting to see how often he has been tested over the last 3 years both at club level and international.
Ermmmm really?Even if people did use performance enhancing drugs in football, how much difference would it actually make? Even if you got big and fast as **** the likes of Barcelona would still pass triangles around you for 90 minutes. Football is one of the only sports where physical limitations like height, strength and pace don't hold you back a great deal.
I just don't see it myself.
Ermmmm really?
Stamina? Being able to cover more ground? Muscle bulk for strength and power? Increased speed from larger leg muscles?
You could use the same argument in athletics though.I'm not denying there wouldn't be advantages. I just don't think you could bridge the gap of being a decent player and turn yourself into a world class player with the help of performance enhancing drugs.
For example Kevin Stewart could take as many performance enhancing drugs as he likes, he'll still be Kevin Stewart. That's all I'm saying. So much of football is played in the head, its not as clear cut as in a sport like rugby where physical superiority results in automatic greatness, you have to be able to actually play football to begin with.
The drug he's alleged to have taken is a diuretic. If he was a weightlifter or a track athlete the fingers would be pointing that it was being used as a masking agent - which is what it is used for - to hide the use of anabolic steroids.
You could use the same argument in athletics though.
Big Ali from the bab shop could take roids, EPO and half the contents of Boots and he'd not make a sprinter, but that's not how sport works
It's all about the accumulation of marginal gains and PEDs provide an advantage. They're athletes not just footballers