New membership scheme & Thirty's Plenty...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It does, but the club is a business and, as dreadful as it might be, sometimes you break bread with the devil. I find Snigger's input tiresome, but I would take him a can, or two, to his shed, so we could find a better way to view the world - trouble is, the daft bugger's bought one too small. <doh>

I agree with this as well, but just because he's the devil it's no excuse to be rude to him.
 
I have tried to include different variations of groups in different stands, hope this makes sense.

**** me it didn't even load, bastarding thing
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

This makes depressing reading. I wonder if the club did something similar before deciding on the prices. If they did, well.....
 
I agree with this as well, but just because he's the devil it's no excuse to be rude to him.

It depends on your position. He has been rude a'plenty to many thousands of good folk so a bit of rudeness (honesty, plainly said?) back isn't too bad in my view. But holding high office (sic) in the Trust does require folk to rein back their internet insults; I said so at the time, many moons ago. The whole business of Allam's communication strategy is very underestimated, in my view. He laughs at niceness, he soaks up politeness and spits it back at you. If being blunt is rude, then folk need to get rude with him.
 
It depends on your position. He has been rude a'plenty to many thousands of good folk so a bit of rudeness (honesty, plainly said?) back isn't too bad in my view. But holding high office (sic) in the Trust does require folk to rein back their internet insults; I said so at the time, many moons ago. The whole business of Allam's communication strategy is very underestimated, in my view. He laughs at niceness, he soaks up politeness and spits it back at you. If being blunt is rude, then folk need to get rude with him.

For me there is no excuse for James Mooney to be rude to PLT and to refuse to answer the questions he asked on behalf of this board. There is a difference, at least to me, between being rude and being firm. You can politely say no and mean it.
 
Some of those defending the Allams, would have you believe it was all down to the staff, or the SMC or Strawberry or anybody but them.

It must have been, his CV puts him oh so far above this type of nonsense.
 
So I've just got back from holiday, and this still sounds complicated (and about as good as our on field performance while I've been away)
As an E2 evictee I assume it will be handled appallingly anyway so that's not really worth discussing
However does anyone know if groups of adults (with no kids) in South Stand will be evicted? The website says "any current singular adult Season Card holders in this area will be required to move to another area" and I was away with a current pass holder (late 40's) who goes with his Mum and other adult relatives, but no kids, and we weren't sure. They are a group rather than "singular" but are all adults. Will they have to move (for what it's worth if they are they won't renew...or sign up)
 
No one says you shouldn't enjoy them. It is your bumptious posts informing people who were actually there at the time which music and films were important and relevant which is irritating. Some of us experienced those things whilst you base your opinions on the experience and writings of others, a lot of which is ill informed at best and downright inaccurate as well.

I'd love for you to point out posts in which I do such a thing. I'm genuinely interesting in knowing where I have done so, because I would like to know myself.

Seems more like you just have a gripe with me (which you can't deny, because you always for some reason target me in threads even if someone says something the same).

If you are referring to my reviews on the Film thread, I guess you have no idea how reviews work... alternatively, if it for some reason bothers you so much, you could always ignore it? Though I probably shouldn't expect you to do so, you like to argue with others on here.




Apologies to anyone reading all this derailment, I just want to know what I apparently have written in the past, at least in the eyes of the man who probably has better things to do than try to harass someone on an internet forum constantly.
 
Last edited:
This makes depressing reading. I wonder if the club did something similar before deciding on the prices. If they did, well.....

To be honest I have no idea, I
So I've just got back from holiday, and this still sounds complicated (and about as good as our on field performance while I've been away)
As an E2 evictee I assume it will be handled appallingly anyway so that's not really worth discussing
However does anyone know if groups of adults (with no kids) in South Stand will be evicted? The website says "any current singular adult Season Card holders in this area will be required to move to another area" and I was away with a current pass holder (late 40's) who goes with his Mum and other adult relatives, but no kids, and we weren't sure. They are a group rather than "singular" but are all adults. Will they have to move (for what it's worth if they are they won't renew...or sign up)

The South Stand will be a family only stand.
 
I'd love for you to point out posts in which I do such a thing. I'm genuinely interesting in knowing where I have done so, because I would like to know myself.

Seems more like you just have a gripe with me (which you can't deny, because you always for some reason target me in threads even if someone says something the same).

If you are referring to my reviews on the Film thread, I guess you have no idea how reviews work... alternatively, if it for some reason bothers you so much, you could always ignore it? Though I probably shouldn't expect you to do so, you like to argue with others on here.




Apologies to anyone reading all this derailment, I just want to know what I apparently have written in the past, at least in the eyes of the man who probably has better things to do than try to harass someone on an internet forum constantly.

No need to apologise. Your input to the Film thread is informative and enjoyable. The thread is different, inoffensive and very 'take it or leave it'. Don't respond further, you have no reason to do so; just enjoy the thread as lots of us do. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quill