New membership scheme & Thirty's Plenty...

Funny, back in the 1960s everyone you knew was in the pub at 16. Nowadays that isn't the case.

 

Apart from the one's studying to get into University obviously

 

It's because we had money, the benefits of paying half price on the bus and at City.

 

Newsflash. It's not 1963 anymore.

 

Or in the Junior Leaders regiments of the Army. £10.21 a week, £2.00 pocket money!

 

Rent boy ?

 

At 16 1/2 i was earning around 60p a week in newhall flockton d.c



Mind you i couldnt get out to go to city games

 

I agree with this as well, but just because he's the devil it's no excuse to be rude to him.

 

This makes depressing reading. I wonder if the club did something similar before deciding on the prices. If they did, well.....

 

It depends on your position. He has been rude a'plenty to many thousands of good folk so a bit of rudeness (honesty, plainly said?) back isn't too bad in my view. But holding high office (sic) in the Trust does require folk to rein back their internet insults; I said so at the time, many moons ago. The whole business of Allam's communication strategy is very underestimated, in my view. He laughs at niceness, he soaks up politeness and spits it back at you. If being blunt is rude, then folk need to get rude with him.

 

Of course they did, why wouldn't they?

 

You were overpaid, you scoundrel.

 

Some of those defending the Allams, would have you believe it was all down to the staff, or the SMC or Strawberry or anybody but them.

 

For me there is no excuse for James Mooney to be rude to PLT and to refuse to answer the questions he asked on behalf of this board. There is a difference, at least to me, between being rude and being firm. You can politely say no and mean it.

 

It must have been, his CV puts him oh so far above this type of nonsense.

 

So I've just got back from holiday, and this still sounds complicated (and about as good as our on field performance while I've been away)
As an E2 evictee I assume it will be handled appallingly anyway so that's not really worth discussing
However does anyone know if groups of adults (with no kids) in South Stand will be evicted? The website says "any current singular adult Season Card holders in this area will be required to move to another area" and I was away with a current pass holder (late 40's) who goes with his Mum and other adult relatives, but no kids, and we weren't sure. They are a group rather than "singular" but are all adults. Will they have to move (for what it's worth if they are they won't renew...or sign up)

 

I'd love for you to point out posts in which I do such a thing. I'm genuinely interesting in knowing where I have done so, because I would like to know myself.

Seems more like you just have a gripe with me (which you can't deny, because you always for some reason target me in threads even if someone says something the same).

If you are referring to my reviews on the Film thread, I guess you have no idea how reviews work... alternatively, if it for some reason bothers you so much, you could always ignore it? Though I probably shouldn't expect you to do so, you like to argue with others on here.




Apologies to anyone reading all this derailment, I just want to know what I apparently have written in the past, at least in the eyes of the man who probably has better things to do than try to harass someone on an internet forum constantly.

 

MK Dons and Leeds both had stands closed when playing us.

 

To be honest I have no idea, I

The South Stand will be a family only stand.

 

No need to apologise. Your input to the Film thread is informative and enjoyable. The thread is different, inoffensive and very 'take it or leave it'. Don't respond further, you have no reason to do so; just enjoy the thread as lots of us do.