Akpom said himself he was ineligible to play Arsenal, one would assume the same of Hayden. Think it's the case with almost all domestic loan deals these days.
Well....who'd have thought ?! A change would have been nice At least Shrewsbury have got an easy tie so if we do happen to beat Arse then we can play them next instead
That's a league rule, it doesn't apply in cup games, but we do need their permission to play him and they won't give it.
Calm down ladies it's only a football match!! Burnley nearly got a result there. I don't see why we can't go one better and if we lose to Arsenal there's no shame.
Exactly! We've done it before, there's nothing to fear, we'll put out a decent team & Akpom & Hayden won't be playing!
[QUOPat E O'Dors, post: 8863982, member: 1015376"]Corrected for you.[/QUOTE] Much appreciated, thank you so much sir
Seems a strange rule. It's a hell of a conflict of interest to put on the shoulders of a player. Open to abuse by parent clubs.
It's not a league rule, Oilyvagina and Tony G played for Cardiff and ourselves respectively whilst on loan. It's just something clubs insist on, although FIFA claimed it isn't within the laws to do so when Chelsea tried that trick with Athletico over Courtois.
Just the league, but we'd need permission from Arsenal for them to play and they won't give it (We wouldn't want them playing against their parent club anyway).
Let's do this **** again. Anyone remember on MOTD. ARE YOU WATCHING LAWRENSON? ARE YOU WATCHING LAWRENSON? Lineker pointed it out to him in good humour and this was his reaction... please log in to view this image
Pointless conversation. Do you actually think there's any chance Hayden and Akpom will play against Arsenal??
Yeah I get that, was just curious about the actual rule and its application. I'd rather see Hernandez play anyhow, lets just hope we don't put a B team out this time.
