The problem with the midfield is that we have to play with two DM's to help cover for the lack of quality in defence - it virtually sacrifices any creativity and thus we have to rely on an aging and inconsistent Wes for any creativity at all.
Strengthening the defence could enable us to sacrifice one of the DM's for someone with a bit more creativity (not sure who that might be though)
See I thought we had a solution to this. The idea is that both Tettey and Mulumbu should be able to screen the defence but get forward a bit too. It comes down to if they and their team mates are on it or not. We play poorly and give the ball away and they sit deeper and deeper and isolate those in front. If we play better then it all moves forward, the fullbacks can help make up attacking numbers and compensate for the midfield lack of width. But it's all so dependant on some confidence and keeping the ball a bit better. Teams who press us hard tend to really unsettle that, did Bournemouth do that today? Fundamentally I believe in the system and even in the players ability to play it some of the time. Age old thing though, better players make it easier. I'd make a few changes;
Firstly think Hoolahan shouldn't play away from home, maybe less so full stop, if Naismith does arrive I think that will be inevitable. He will work the oposition much harder closing them down and make more happen more often hopefully. If not Naismith I'd like to see Vadis there. Somehow we need to get a balance in the middle to keep and retrieve the ball better. Whether that means no wingers with Tettey, Mulumbu, Dorrans/O'Neil Howson and Vadis and again Brady and Pinto bombing on I don't know but nothings gonna work if we font turn up!
Bah!
)


