Match Day Thread Hull City v Leicester City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Carmine Galante. said:
I'll give Leicester fans credit for being the thickest set of arsewipes to come here for a long time.

Just shortly after they scored a rendition of " You're ****, you're ****ing ****" could be heard from them.

Not to be confused with the tedious "You're support is ****ing ****" one we get every game. Which, by the way, they did sing and I found highly ironic because in the main that's exactly what their support was. Silent for massive spells of the game, very poor.

Back to the other chant.

1-0 down against a team a division above us in extra time and that makes us **** apparently?

I said to my boy at the time that if they were hammering us 3 or 4 nil you couldn't really complain but when 1-0 up when you've been the poorer side really doesn't give cause for such a dickish chant.

Oh and look what happened in the end.

If we're '****ing ****' what does that make them?
Click to expand...
They were the biggest bunch of knobs I've seen from the away support for a while which made the 'who are ya' at the end particularly satisfying from the East Stand
 
BojackHCAFCofYorkshire said:
They were the biggest bunch of knobs I've seen from the away support for a while which made the 'who are ya' at the end particularly satisfying from the East Stand
Click to expand...

That "you're **** ahhhh" thing that they do to the keeper is a ****ing embarrassment, which is why it was so satisfying that our '****' keeper saved El Cheato's penalty. It actually originated from Bristol Rovers (the Ahhh bit should be Arrr, something to do with Pirates or summat), so **** knows why they do it, it makes them look a right set of knobs. It's worse than the Tiger maul thing some of our fans used to do.

Just like a library eh? Well if it's a library, shut the **** up.

We'll sing when we want
We'll sing when we want
We are Hull City
We'll sing when we want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOJACKHCAFCMAN
Sterling Archer said:
That "you're **** ahhhh" thing that they do to the keeper is a ****ing embarrassment, which is why it was so satisfying that our '****' keeper saved El Cheato's penalty. It actually originated from Bristol Rovers (the Ahhh bit should be Arrr, something to do with Pirates or summat), so **** knows why they do it, it makes them look a right set of knobs. It's worse than the Tiger maul thing some of our fans used to do.

Just like a library eh? Well if it's a library, shut the **** up.

We'll sing when we want
We'll sing when we want
We are Hull City
We'll sing when we want.
Click to expand...
^

We'll sing when we want ??? Are you for ****in real <laugh>
Don't throw stones in greenhouses<laugh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Are they really challenging it legally?

The last I heard, someone asked the question of the legality and was told that it was legal.

Where exactly is the case you know about up to?
Click to expand...
Chazz Rheinhold said:
There's no spin. Couldnt care less. I got 3 games for free. Or at least 45 quid off my season pass price.

Are these fans being supported through their court case by the Trust??
Click to expand...

Nothing to do with HCST. There are people who initially spoke to Trading Standards and subsequently gave statements (can't remember the official name) on the understanding it would mean they'd have to attend court if it gets that far. That wasn't very long ago but I'm not sure what happens with those statements next. I also spoke to them and the Trading Standards people told me that there was a strong case. But obviously I didn't buy a pass, so I had no grounds to complain myself.

You can't go telling mistruths to your customers about promotional prices. The club realised that pass sales were low and they couldn't get away with the planned and advertised rise after the May cutoff, so they cancelled that but then realised anyone who bought early had been lied to so they came up with this cup thing. It's actually worked well for league cup attendances, but you can't just change the deal retrospectively like that. In retail it's a well dodgy practice. Football is no different
 
PLT said:
Nothing to do with HCST. There are people who initially spoke to Trading Standards and subsequently gave statements (can't remember the official name) on the understanding it would mean they'd have to attend court if it gets that far. That wasn't very long ago but I'm not sure what happens with those statements next. I also spoke to them and the Trading Standards people told me that there was a strong case. But obviously I didn't buy a pass, so I had no grounds to complain myself.

You can't go telling mistruths to your customers about promotional prices. The club realised that pass sales were low and they couldn't get away with the planned and advertised rise after the May cutoff, so they cancelled that but then realised anyone who bought early had been lied to so they came up with this cup thing. It's actually worked well for league cup attendances, but you can't just change the deal retrospectively like that. In retail it's a well dodgy practice. Football is no different
Click to expand...


Anyone who makes a statement in such cases, would have to do so in the clear understanding they could have to attend court if it gets that far. It doesn't mean much, only that their version of events would be considered. It just filters out people and reduces the likelihood of them colouring it in too far. Any prosecution wouldn't be based on those statements, they're more just to determine the impact on 'victims'.

If the law has been broken, which is what Trading Standards would look at, it wouldn't make a difference if you'd bought a pass or not.

I forget the details, but your version was argued at the time, and there were plenty pointing out where it fell over.
 
FosseFilberto said:
...Oh the old "if I'm exposed as a bell end, I was intentionally fishing" line ... predictable bell end then?
Click to expand...

Bit of both. I am a bellend and I was wondering how many Leicester fans (and others) would bite. Thanks.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Anyone who makes a statement in such cases, would have to do so in the clear understanding they could have to attend court if it gets that far. It doesn't mean much, only that their version of events would be considered. It just filters out people and reduces the likelihood of them colouring it in too far. Any prosecution wouldn't be based on those statements, they're more just to determine the impact on 'victims'.

If the law has been broken, which is what Trading Standards would look at, it wouldn't make a difference if you'd bought a pass or not.

I forget the details, but your version was argued at the time, and there were plenty pointing out where it fell over.
Click to expand...

By plenty you mean Chazz just repeatedly insisting I didn't know what I was on about.

They specifically told me it did matter that I hadn't bought a pass but that anyone who had bought one would have good grounds to complain, which is what then happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back