You must log in or register to see images
I'm not sure 4-% is going to cut it...
You must log in or register to see images
I think the media, and public, are being overly harsh on Lancaster and the team. The bare fact is that the current crop of England players just aren't world cup winners. On occasion, such as against NZ in 2012, or was it 2013, they can be organised enough and all upped their game to win, but not in a tournament.. the lack of 6 nations medals the past years emphasises this.
Would any of the current squad get into the 2003 team.. maybe only one or two. Even the 'creative' players that Lancaster left out - Care, Cipriani and Tuilagi.. they are not world beaters - their varying form over the last 5 years as evidence and shows why Lancaster has been messing around with positions right up to the tournament.. nothing has really worked, because the playing ability isn't as good as it should be.
The rub of the matter is the amount that the RFU have pumped in and got little reward.. this has pushed expectations way beyond the actual talent of the current playing squad.
ESSEX GULL
The bare fact is that the current crop of England players just aren't world cup winners.
ESSEX GULL
Fair point I'd say, they're not world beaters, but then again I don't think any of 6 Nations are.
This was a fairly young squad, Easter aside, the potential in the squad is there, after all they did have an ok 6 nations. Between now and the Japan World Cup in 2019, a couple of grand slam 6 nations and maybe they can emulate that 2003 squad. However; there is a lot of hard graft ahead.
Something that the 2003 squad had was leaders, Johnson, Wilkinson, Back and Dallagio were all very experienced Internationals and natural leaders.
Nilling?South Africa stick 10 tries past the USA as Habana gets a hat trick to nil the USA by 64 points. It was the nilling so far this RWC.
Next up Namibia v Georgia.
Nilling?
Is that an actual thing?
Never heard it before!