We don't know what offers were made, but the indications are that they were not "derisory." Let's say, as some media outlets are suggesting, that Levy offered £25million. Peace may have wanted £30million, but you cannot say that the offer was derisory. And what is going to happen now? Unless another club comes in with a better offer, Levy will get him for £25million in the January window, because Peace cannot afford to let Berahino get into the last year of his contract, which will happen by the time next Summer's window comes around.
I put that in the inverted commas as it was the word he used, no one really knows, but I doubt you offered the £25m up front. There were reports that it was something ridiculous like 7 upfront? But we don't really know. Just think it's a very simplistic view that if a player wants to leave then you should just bow down to the buying club. Like I said earlier let's see if you think like this when it comes to Kane/Lloris.
That's not the case though, is it? Peace's statement was he had told Levy that Berahino was not for sale. Admittedly, he went on to kind of contradict himself by saying that our offer didn't reflect his potential. If Peace has any commercial sense, he will accept that Berahino is leaving and just try to negotiate the best deal.
Yes and No. Yes, because his player doesn't want to be there and wants to leave. No, if the offer wasn't realistic. However, as I just pointed out, Peace's stance was that Berahino wasn't for sale, full stop. Realistically, he should have accepted that the players head was elsewhere and tried to screw Levy for as much as possible. Personally, I think he might be gambling that somebody like Utd will be desperate for a striker in Jan, and pay silly money. But, of course, Utd never do that.
Who's saying that? Not me, for sure! Everything must be taken in its proper context - which was the point of the examples I set out. I could give you several more examples, both from my own clulb and from others, but the jist would be the same. Every player has his price. If Levy had offered something stupid like, say, £60m upfront, few of us would doubt that Peace would have accepted it; but, then, everyone, especially Spurs fans, would have said that we'd been mugged-off and that Levy had been an idiot! That didn't happen. We believe that a figure of around £25 million was offered. Whether that's a fair price or not doesn't really come into it. It's certain not a "derisory" offer, as you said. Peace didn't accept it, and WBA now have a player that has stated on Twitter that he won't play for WBA. Perhaps Peace (and WBA fans) are happy with that outcome? I don't know. My advice to Berahino would be to apologise to the chairman and the club, and buckle down, but make it absolutely clear to the chairman that he intends to join Spurs after his contract ends. Peace, then, with have to make up his mind whether to sell the player in the January window, for the price that Levy wants to pay, or to leave it until the Summer windown, when Berahino will be into the last year of his contract. I'd be happy with either outcome.
Are you even reading? Half of the stuff you just wrote I haven't argued with any of, in fact I've agreed with it, also I explained in my last the post the use of the word 'derisory' and why I placed it in inverted commas which you seemed to have ignored. In the first post I responded to you said it was a choice of 2 things, I proposed a 3rd outcome which you dismissed (though I offered up evidence in Schneiderlin, and you later provided another in Modric) I was challenging the whole 'if a player wants to leave, there's no point trying to keep hold of him' and the 'let him go to the club of his choice for the price that the other club is prepared to pay'.
But that is what, almost inevitably, happens! I know you don't like that - which is why, presumably, you are continuing to argue with me on the point - but that is the way it is.
We could well sign him for £50million in January, wouldn't surprise me at all sadly. I think Peace was making a statement, which other clubs have also made. Southampton refused to sell Wanyama, Everton refused to sell Stones. Clubs are that bit richer now and don't feel like they have to be bullied into selling their best players when they're not ready to.
My point is (as I've said before) you are stating it in a matter of fact manner, it's black and white, clear as day. When really, it is nothing of the sort and you need to look at every situation in isolation. Also I don't know you keep bringing back to 'me not liking it' - most football fans don't like players/clubs acting like ****s but I think I've had a lot of getting used to it over recent years. You still haven't answer what I asked earlier, so I'll use a hypothetical situation this time - say this is Kane to United next Summer, you want £50m, United only prepared to pay £20m. Kane wants to leave, you will then say the right course of action is to just bow down to the bigger club without a fight and just accept the £20m?
Exactly the point I tried making earlier in the thread, to Pearce the small loss may be worth it to send a message out n not allow his club to be bullied.
You keep going round in the same circle! Are you PIXIE in disguise? Kane doesn't want to leave Spurs, which is why United (and probably other clubs) made no bid for him. Had Kane made it known that he wanted out of Spurs, I expect that a few clubs would have put in offers. It would, then, have come down to whether or not the price was right. Levy has shown, many times, in the past that he will sell players that he would rather keep if the player wants out. Presumably, that's because Levy knows that there is no point in trying to keep hold of a player who is determined to leave.
I think we'll just leave it, as you say we're going round in circles and you're not actually answering anything I'm putting to you, just spinning more bullshit in a different order with no answer, you'd make a good politician. I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt but I now understand why a lot of people don't even bother to try and debate with you
No it's because Levy and Lewis are businessmen and they like a profit. Spurs invest relatively little money in players, more often than not they trade off the back of money they've accrued from sales. Lewis is a multi billionaire but has never shown much interest in gambling any of his money on Spurs in the way Roman has on Chelsea.
Plenty of people debate with me. I know the point that you are making, and I'm saying that it is as black and white as I have put it. Therein lies our disagreement. I don't expect, or need, you to agree with me. I'm a grown up, I can accept the fact that there are plenty of people out there who don't share the same views as me, on a whole range of topics.
Along with the new TV package and financial packages for PL clubs do WBA have to sell? I'd say no. Do they want a big payday for a player who wants out then yes and I think they'll still get that in Jan whilst pissing of the little twat in the process and making a statement that they wont be taken for a mug or be dictated to by a player under contract.
