The Daily Arsenal

It's even worse if you actually believe the **** you write.

You're better off sticking to being a **** wum mate

 

New Tottenham forward Clinton N'Jie, 22, says he made the right decision to turn down a move to Arsenal.
(Daily Express)

Too right, you did, son!


So, how much did Wenger bid on him to try to steal this young lad off us?

I'm betting it was near enough double.

However, it sounds as if this young lad has heard news of the potential shift in Power, in North London, and cut his cloth to suit. I remain undecided on the infamous Power-Shift, but I wouldn't deny this young lad his opinion.

 

More like he knew he wouldn't get in the first team at Arsenal

 

You still haven't answered my question, PISKIE!

How much more did Wenger offer to try to tempt N'Jie from his dream-move to Spurs?

It's a simple enough question. Why are you avoiding an answer?

 

Calm down petal, I didn't see your paper thin wum attempt the first time.

No idea what Wenger offered. But I don't blame N'Jie, he's not going to get any first team action at Arsenal. Even if we had signed him we'd probably have to have loaned him out to a smaller club like Spurs for him to get any games

 

Uh oh talks of power shifts again.

Cleary the power is shifting to east london cause we beat Arsenal once in a blue moon.

#realpowershiftistoeastlondon

 

@PISKIE

You do realise, don't you, that I was pulling your leg, and parodying your recent tussle with CFC?

Oh, wait! No, that's right... you believe that when people write on this site is what they actually think and believe, despite the fact that, often, its is patently clear to even a dribbling moron, that ribs are being tickled and funny-bones felt!

 

Goodness that was a side splittingly witty retort HIAG. Did you go to comedy school as well as rock school, referee school and law school ?

So if you didn't believe that it would be 'an easy 3 points for Palace' then it was, as I said, another failed WUM attempt.

It was hardly a tussle with CFC. It was (and still is) him simply avoiding my questions about Maureen's gradual descent into lunacy.

 

Even Piskie has admitted that was a load of bull I'm afraid.

 

Lee263 is a young wum-buck. He has a lot of learning to do.

 

Fixed

 

Very witty, CFC!

 

He changed the name from HIAG to Pixie and you think that is witty You two together don't even make a halfwit.

 

Pixie has gone crazy, HIAG. He keeps on asking me why Mou says this and that, like all Chelsea fans are accountable for Jose's words.

Which is strange, as P will not even answer questions about his own posts: dodging questions about his own words on Arsenal's preseason and lack of goals under Wenger from 1996-2001

 

Nice try. I've answered your question several times, you're just too dense to recognise it.

I didn't ask you why Maureen said the things he did, I asked you to explain how Chelsea could be the better team in the 2nd half against City when they conceded twice as many as they did in the first half.

If you don't agree with that assessment, then you must think Maureen is talking out of his arse. If you do agree with him, then you need to answer the question.

 

Where did I say Chelsea were the better side?

 

You do understand what the word "opinion" means, don't you, PISKIE? And you do understand that none of us are in a court of law on this site, where we can only speak facts, certifiable with evidence, don't you?

 

I'm asking you to explain what you think of Maureen comments about Chelsea being the better team.

Do you think his comments were bollocks ?

 

Why do you value my opinion so much?

 

I'm interested to know whether you agree with Maureen about it or whether you think he's talking out of his backside.